185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887444)
1. 5-aminolevulinic-acid-based fluorescence spectroscopy and conventional colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical pre-malignancy.
Vansevičiūtė R; Venius J; Žukovskaja O; Kanopienė D; Letautienė S; Rotomskis R
BMC Womens Health; 2015 Apr; 15():35. PubMed ID: 25887444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photodetection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced porphyrin fluorescence.
Hillemanns P; Weingandt H; Baumgartner R; Diebold J; Xiang W; Stepp H
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2275-82. PubMed ID: 10820349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of PDD, colposcopy and cytology in the detection of cervical neoplastic lesions].
Szafińska-Dolata A; Kedzia W; Szafiński A; Józefiak A; Spaczyński M
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 19824459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 5-Aminolevulinic acid-based fluorescence diagnostics of cervical preinvasive changes.
Vansevičiūtė R; Venius J; Letautienė S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2014; 50(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 25323540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wojciech R
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Aug; 82(8):607-11. PubMed ID: 21957606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concordance of HPV, conventional smear, colposcopy, and conization results in cervical dysplasia.
Aydogan Kirmizi D; Baser E; Demir Caltekin M; Onat T; Sahin S; Yalvac ES
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jan; 49(1):132-139. PubMed ID: 33118711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optical detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in vivo: results of a 604-patient study.
Huh WK; Cestero RM; Garcia FA; Gold MA; Guido RS; McIntyre-Seltman K; Harper DM; Burke L; Sum ST; Flewelling RF; Alvarez RD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1249-57. PubMed ID: 15167826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical value of p16
Song FB; Du H; Xiao AM; Wang C; Huang X; Yan PS; Liu ZH; Qu XF; Belinson JEROMEL; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):784-790. PubMed ID: 33228350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjunctive colposcopy technologies for assessing suspected cervical abnormalities: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Peron M; Llewellyn A; Moe-Byrne T; Walker S; Walton M; Harden M; Palmer S; Simmonds M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Sep; 22(54):1-260. PubMed ID: 30284968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a real-time optoelectronic method in the diagnostics of CIN over four years of observations.
Suchońska B; Gajzlerska-Majewska W; Wielgoś M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247702. PubMed ID: 33635909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of human papilloma virus testing and spectroscopy combined with cervical cytology for the detection of high-grade cervical neoplasia.
Werner CL; Griffith WF; Ashfaq R; Gossett D; Wilkinson E; Raab S; Bambot S; Mongin D; Faupel M
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Apr; 11(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17415110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy.
Tidy JA; Brown BH; Healey TJ; Daayana S; Martin M; Prendiville W; Kitchener HC
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):400-10; discussion 410-1. PubMed ID: 23289897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo optical cellular diagnosis for uterine cervical or vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia using flexible gastrointestinal endocytoscopy -a prospective pilot study.
Ono S; Nozaki A; Matsuda K; Takakuwa E; Sakamoto N; Watari H
BMC Cancer; 2020 Oct; 20(1):955. PubMed ID: 33008349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of a pilot study of multispectral digital colposcopy for the in vivo detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Milbourne A; Park SY; Benedet JL; Miller D; Ehlen T; Rhodes H; Malpica A; Matisic J; Van Niekirk D; Atkinson EN; Hadad N; Mackinnon N; Macaulay C; Richards-Kortum R; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S67-75. PubMed ID: 16202444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Combining high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test and cytological test to detect early cervical dysplasia].
Qian DY; Cen JM; Wang D; Zeng RH; Lin AH; Shu YH; Hong DH; Huang ZH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 41(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 16635326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
