354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887521)
1. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography.
Celikten B; Uzuntas CF; Kursun S; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Orhan K; Demiralp KÖ
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():32. PubMed ID: 25887521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.
Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2053-6. PubMed ID: 25301350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT evaluation of apical canal transportation associated with stainless steel hand files, oscillatory technique and pro taper rotary system.
Hartmann MS; Fontanella VR; Vanni JR; Fornari VJ; Barletta FB
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 21861027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile.
Zanette F; Grazziotin-Soares R; Flores ME; Camargo Fontanella VR; Gavini G; Barletta FB
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 24767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems.
Marzouk AM; Ghoneim AG
J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):906-9. PubMed ID: 23791261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary PathFile in maxillary first molars curved canals.
Pasqualini D; Bianchi CC; Paolino DS; Mancini L; Cemenasco A; Cantatore G; Castellucci A; Berutti E
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 22341081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Micro-CT analyses of apical enlargement and molar root canal complexity.
Markvart M; Darvann TA; Larsen P; Dalstra M; Kreiborg S; Bjørndal L
Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 22044111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
Özer SY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy.
Canoglu H; Tekcicek MU; Cehreli ZC
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 17249433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
