These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887521)

  • 61. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars.
    van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA
    J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparative assessment of the effects of Gates-Glidden, Largo, LA-Axxess, and New Brazilian Drill CPdrill on coronal pre-enlargement: cone-beam computed tomographic analysis.
    Flores CB; Montagner F; Gomes BP; Dotto GN; da Silva Schmitz M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 24666914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A comparative study of biofilm removal with hand, rotary nickel-titanium, and self-adjusting file instrumentation using a novel in vitro biofilm model.
    Lin J; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 23611386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study.
    Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effect of EDTA preparations on rotary root canal instrumentation.
    Whitbeck ER; Swenson K; Tordik PA; Kondor SA; Webb TD; Sun J
    J Endod; 2015 Jan; 41(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 25190604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single-file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped canals.
    De-Deus G; Barino B; Zamolyi RQ; Souza E; Fonseca A; Fidel S; Fidel RA
    J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1897-900. PubMed ID: 20951309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Evaluation of apical foramen deformation produced by manual and mechanized patency maneuvers.
    Lopreite G; Basilaki J; Romero M; Hecht P
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 25523959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Hülsmann M; Schade M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):538-46. PubMed ID: 11601772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The X-files: four case reports.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 2009 Jan; 28(1):108, 110-1. PubMed ID: 19323334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparative Analysis of Protaper and Waveone Systems to Reduce Enterococcus Faecalis from Root Canal System in Primary Molars--An in Vitro Study.
    Pinheiro SL; Pessoa C; da Silva JN; Gonçalves RO; Duarte DA; da Silveira Bueno CE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 26950813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Influence of the NiTi rotary system on the debridement quality of the root canal space.
    De-Deus G; Garcia-Filho P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):e71-6. PubMed ID: 19778736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
    Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Root canal preparation with a novel nickel-titanium instrument evaluated with micro-computed tomography: canal surface preparation over time.
    Peters OA; Boessler C; Paqué F
    J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1068-72. PubMed ID: 20478468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Appearance of the root canal walls after preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Prati C; Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Jun; 8(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 14760541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture.
    Kim HC; Lee MH; Yum J; Versluis A; Lee CJ; Kim BM
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1195-9. PubMed ID: 20630298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Root canal shaping using a reciprocating file system.
    Landwehr DJ
    Dent Today; 2013 Feb; 32(2):94, 96-9. PubMed ID: 23431872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.