These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887562)

  • 1. Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs.
    van Grevenhof IE; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):14. PubMed ID: 25887562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
    See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.
    Liu S; Yao T; Chen D; Xiao S; Chen L; Zhang Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):21. PubMed ID: 36977978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review: optimizing genomic selection for crossbred performance by model improvement and data collection.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Aug; 99(8):. PubMed ID: 34223907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of inclusion rates of crossbred phenotypes and genotypes in nucleus selection programs.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33180915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.
    Esfandyari H; Thekkoot D; Kemp R; Plastow G; Dekkers J
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33325519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Nov; 99(11):. PubMed ID: 34661671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of genomic predictions for body weight in broilers using crossbred information and considering breed-of-origin of alleles.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 31286857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
    Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.
    Kramer LM; Wolc A; Esfandyari H; Thekkoot DM; Zhang C; Kemp RA; Plastow G; Dekkers JCM
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Oct; 99(10):. PubMed ID: 34558614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
    Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Lopes PS; Bastiaansen JWM; Guimarães SEF
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(3):817-829. PubMed ID: 29378008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BOARD INVITED REVIEW: The purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications.
    Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3467-3478. PubMed ID: 28805893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.