These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887562)

  • 21. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders.
    van Grevenhof EM; Vandenplas J; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):548-558. PubMed ID: 30423111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic correlations between growth performance and carcass traits of purebred and crossbred pigs raised in tropical and temperate climates1.
    Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Komen H; Guimarães SEF; Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JWM
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3648-3657. PubMed ID: 31278865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implementing a genomic rotational crossbreeding scheme to promote local dairy cattle breeds-A simulation study.
    Stock J; Esfandyari H; Hinrichs D; Bennewitz J
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):6873-6884. PubMed ID: 33773793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inheritance of duration of fertility in female common ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) inseminated in pure breeding or in inter-generic crossbreeding with Muscovy drakes (Cairina moschata).
    Brun JM; Mialon MM; Sellier N; Brillard JP; Rouvier R
    Animal; 2012 Nov; 6(11):1731-7. PubMed ID: 23031599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.
    Srihi H; Noguera JL; Topayan V; Martín de Hijas M; Ibañez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Vázquez-Gómez M; Martínez-Castillero M; Rosas JP; Varona L
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Including crossbred pigs in the genomic relationship matrix through utilization of both linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis.
    Iversen MW; Nordbø Ø; Gjerlaug-Enger E; Grindflek E; Lopes MS; Meuwissen THE
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Dec; 95(12):5197-5207. PubMed ID: 29293760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.
    Porto-Neto LR; Barendse W; Henshall JM; McWilliam SM; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():84. PubMed ID: 26525050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Machine Learning Prediction of Crossbred Pig Feed Efficiency and Growth Rate From Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.
    Tusell L; Bergsma R; Gilbert H; Gianola D; Piles M
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():567818. PubMed ID: 33391339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits.
    Buch LH; Kargo M; Berg P; Lassen J; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2012 Jun; 6(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 22558957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic selection in animal breeding programs.
    van der Werf J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():543-61. PubMed ID: 23756910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.