These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25887695)
1. Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences. Stanley D; Geier MS; Chen H; Hughes RJ; Moore RJ BMC Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 15():51. PubMed ID: 25887695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-throughput sequencing technology to reveal the composition and function of cecal microbiota in Dagu chicken. Xu Y; Yang H; Zhang L; Su Y; Shi D; Xiao H; Tian Y BMC Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):259. PubMed ID: 27814685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives. Oakley BB; Buhr RJ; Ritz CW; Kiepper BH; Berrang ME; Seal BS; Cox NA BMC Vet Res; 2014 Nov; 10():282. PubMed ID: 25427406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The gastrointestinal tract microbiota of the Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica. Wilkinson N; Hughes RJ; Aspden WJ; Chapman J; Moore RJ; Stanley D Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 May; 100(9):4201-9. PubMed ID: 26758298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cecal drop reflects the chickens' cecal microbiome, fecal drop does not. Pauwels J; Taminiau B; Janssens GP; De Beenhouwer M; Delhalle L; Daube G; Coopman F J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Oct; 117():164-70. PubMed ID: 26264624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A reasonable correlation between cloacal and cecal microbiomes in broiler chickens. Andreani NA; Donaldson CJ; Goddard M Poult Sci; 2020 Nov; 99(11):6062-6070. PubMed ID: 33142525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbial diversity in ostrich ceca as revealed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene clone library and detection of novel Fibrobacter species. Matsui H; Kato Y; Chikaraishi T; Moritani M; Ban-Tokuda T; Wakita M Anaerobe; 2010 Apr; 16(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 19632349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Capturing the diversity of the human gut microbiota through culture-enriched molecular profiling. Lau JT; Whelan FJ; Herath I; Lee CH; Collins SM; Bercik P; Surette MG Genome Med; 2016 Jul; 8(1):72. PubMed ID: 27363992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interrelations between the microbiotas in the litter and in the intestines of commercial broiler chickens. Cressman MD; Yu Z; Nelson MC; Moeller SJ; Lilburn MS; Zerby HN Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 76(19):6572-82. PubMed ID: 20693454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cecal versus fecal microbiota in Ossabaw swine and implications for obesity. Panasevich MR; Wankhade UD; Chintapalli SV; Shankar K; Rector RS Physiol Genomics; 2018 May; 50(5):355-368. PubMed ID: 29521600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diversity of Duodenal and Rectal Microbiota in Biopsy Tissues and Luminal Contents in Healthy Volunteers. Li G; Yang M; Zhou K; Zhang L; Tian L; Lv S; Jin Y; Qian W; Xiong H; Lin R; Fu Y; Hou X J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1136-45. PubMed ID: 25737115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterizing the fecal microbiota of infants with botulism. Shirey TB; Dykes JK; Lúquez C; Maslanka SE; Raphael BH Microbiome; 2015 Nov; 3():54. PubMed ID: 26593441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic Groups. Fisher JC; Eren AM; Green HC; Shanks OC; Morrison HG; Vineis JH; Sogin ML; McLellan SL Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 81(20):7023-33. PubMed ID: 26231648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in cecal microbiome of selected high and low feather-pecking laying hens. Birkl P; Bharwani A; Kjaer JB; Kunze W; McBride P; Forsythe P; Harlander-Matauschek A Poult Sci; 2018 Sep; 97(9):3009-3014. PubMed ID: 29800328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal dynamics of the very premature infant gut dominant microbiota. Aujoulat F; Roudière L; Picaud JC; Jacquot A; Filleron A; Neveu D; Baum TP; Marchandin H; Jumas-Bilak E BMC Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 14():325. PubMed ID: 25551282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of factors contributing to variation in the C57BL/6J fecal microbiota across German animal facilities. Rausch P; Basic M; Batra A; Bischoff SC; Blaut M; Clavel T; Gläsner J; Gopalakrishnan S; Grassl GA; Günther C; Haller D; Hirose M; Ibrahim S; Loh G; Mattner J; Nagel S; Pabst O; Schmidt F; Siegmund B; Strowig T; Volynets V; Wirtz S; Zeissig S; Zeissig Y; Bleich A; Baines JF Int J Med Microbiol; 2016 Aug; 306(5):343-355. PubMed ID: 27053239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic changes of the luminal and mucosa-associated gut microbiota during and after antibiotic therapy with paromomycin. Heinsen FA; Knecht H; Neulinger SC; Schmitz RA; Knecht C; Kühbacher T; Rosenstiel PC; Schreiber S; Friedrichs AK; Ott SJ Gut Microbes; 2015 Jul; 6(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 26178862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distribution of Salmonella Enteritidis in internal organs and variation of cecum microbiota in chicken after oral challenge. Zeng J; Lei C; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhang X; Kang Z; Zhai X; Ye X; Wang H Microb Pathog; 2018 Sep; 122():174-179. PubMed ID: 29906541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of composition and individual variability of rumen microbiota in yaks by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology. Guo W; Li Y; Wang L; Wang J; Xu Q; Yan T; Xue B Anaerobe; 2015 Aug; 34():74-9. PubMed ID: 25911445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gut metagenomic analysis reveals prominent roles of Lactobacillus and cecal microbiota in chicken feed efficiency. Yan W; Sun C; Yuan J; Yang N Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():45308. PubMed ID: 28349946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]