BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25888447)

  • 1. The peer review process: a primer for
    Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
    Gasparyan AY; Ayvazyan L; Blackmore H; Kitas GD
    Rheumatol Int; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1409-17. PubMed ID: 21800117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
    Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reviewing an article for Radiología: who and how].
    García Santos JM
    Radiologia; 2011; 53(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 21924445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
    Faggion CM
    Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Authors, reviewers and editors at The EMBO Journal.
    Rørth P
    EMBO J; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3831-3. PubMed ID: 16453402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Submission of articles to Vaccine: a fast and fair peer review process.
    de Hon F; Poland GA
    Vaccine; 2013 Jul; 31(32):3207-8. PubMed ID: 23726824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.
    Green SM; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical journal peer review: process and bias.
    Manchikanti L; Kaye AD; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):E1-E14. PubMed ID: 25675064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The art and science of scientific writing.
    Mestres CA; Sampathkumar A
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jun; 27(5):335-337. PubMed ID: 31188675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers].
    Alfonso F
    Neurologia; 2010; 25(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 21093700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review.
    Krummel M; Blish C; Kuhns M; Cadwell K; Oberst A; Goldrath A; Ansel KM; Chi H; O'Connell R; Wherry EJ; Pepper M;
    Cell; 2019 Dec; 179(7):1441-1445. PubMed ID: 31835023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Editor and authors' psychology and the chance of teaching.
    Grammaticos PC
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 17160154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?
    Allen TW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The manuscript review process of nursing journals.
    Swanson E; McCloskey JC
    Image (IN); 1982 Oct; 14(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 6922826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.
    McNutt RA; Evans AT; Fletcher RH; Fletcher SW
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1371-6. PubMed ID: 2304216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [What do reviewers look for in 'original articles' submitted for publication in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde?].
    Tjon MJ; Sang F; Overbeke AJ; Lockefeer JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Nov; 140(47):2349-52. PubMed ID: 8984399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to review a scientific paper.
    Tandon R
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2014 Oct; 11():124-7. PubMed ID: 25248566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.