302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25888447)
21. Peer review of the biomedical literature.
Olson CM
Am J Emerg Med; 1990 Jul; 8(4):356-8. PubMed ID: 2194471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Registered reports: prospective peer review emphasizes science over spin.
Wilkinson J; Pellicer A; Niederberger C
Fertil Steril; 2019 May; 111(5):831-832. PubMed ID: 30955845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Generosity, collegiality, and scientific accuracy when writing and reviewing original research.
Desselle SP; Chen AM; Amin M; Aslani P; Dawoud D; Miller MJ; Norgaard LS
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2020 Feb; 16(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 31101458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information.
Stringer MJ; Sales-Pardo M; Nunes Amaral LA
PLoS One; 2008 Feb; 3(2):e1683. PubMed ID: 18301760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study.
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):441-5. PubMed ID: 9708752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
Grant MJ
Health Info Libr J; 2018 Dec; 35(4):263-264. PubMed ID: 30499172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. JNIS podcasts: the early part of our journey.
Hirsch JA; Fargen K; Ducruet AF; Tarr RW
J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Feb; 9(2):211-214. PubMed ID: 26763788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.
Smith R
J R Soc Med; 2006 Apr; 99(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 16574968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review and the development of a science.
Stichler JF
HERD; 2011; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 21866503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Arthroscopy Journal Experience: Tailored for You and by You.
Rossi MJ; Lubowitz JH
Arthroscopy; 2016 Apr; 32(4):541-2. PubMed ID: 27039675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Content and communication: how can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?
Shashok K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Jan; 8():3. PubMed ID: 18237378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
Biddle C
AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Journal peer review. The need for a research agenda.
Bailar JC; Patterson K
N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):654-7. PubMed ID: 3974641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal.
Wynne KE; Simpson BJ; Berman L; Rangel SJ; Grosfeld JL; Moss RL
J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Jan; 46(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 21238654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Support for peer review.
Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An overview of the peer review process in biomedical sciences.
Miller E; James Weightman M; Basu A; Amos A; Brakoulias V
Australas Psychiatry; 2024 Jun; 32(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 38327220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Opening up Peer Review.
DePellegrin TA; Johnston M
Genetics; 2020 Nov; 216(3):619-620. PubMed ID: 33158984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process.
Hak DJ; Giannoudis P; Mauffrey C
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 26724808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Improving your journal article using feedback from peer review.
Price B
Nurs Stand; 2014 Sep; 29(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 25249122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
