346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25888610)
1. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors.
Howell D; Molloy S; Wilkinson K; Green E; Orchard K; Wang K; Liberty J
Ann Oncol; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 25888610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials.
Kotronoulas G; Kearney N; Maguire R; Harrow A; Di Domenico D; Croy S; MacGillivray S
J Clin Oncol; 2014 May; 32(14):1480-501. PubMed ID: 24711559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review.
van Egdom LSE; Oemrawsingh A; Verweij LM; Lingsma HF; Koppert LB; Verhoef C; Klazinga NS; Hazelzet JA
Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1197-1226. PubMed ID: 31563263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: a scoping review and Canadian Delphi Consensus.
Howell D; Fitch M; Bakker D; Green E; Sussman J; Mayo S; Mohammed S; Lee C; Doran D
Value Health; 2013; 16(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 23337218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting.
Chen J; Ou L; Hollis SJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Jun; 13():211. PubMed ID: 23758898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and provider assessment in mental health: a systematic review of the context of implementation.
Roe D; Mazor Y; Gelkopf M
Int J Qual Health Care; 2021 Mar; 34(Suppl 1):ii28–ii39. PubMed ID: 31725153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review.
Marshall S; Haywood K; Fitzpatrick R
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Oct; 12(5):559-68. PubMed ID: 16987118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review.
Bouazza YB; Chiairi I; El Kharbouchi O; De Backer L; Vanhoutte G; Janssens A; Van Meerbeeck JP
Lung Cancer; 2017 Nov; 113():140-151. PubMed ID: 29110842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of self-management support in cancer care and normalization into routine practice: a systematic scoping literature review protocol.
Howell D; Richardson A; May C; Calman L; Fazelzad R; Moradian S; Foster C
Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):37. PubMed ID: 30704509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions.
Luckett T; Butow PN; King MT
Psychooncology; 2009 Nov; 18(11):1129-38. PubMed ID: 19319920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care.
Nguyen H; Butow P; Dhillon H; Sundaresan P
J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Jun; 68(2):186-195. PubMed ID: 32815314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research.
Boyce MB; Browne JP; Greenhalgh J
BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Jun; 23(6):508-18. PubMed ID: 24505110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity: identifying oncologic benefit and an evidence-practice gap in routine clinical practice.
Moss MCL; Aggarwal A; Qureshi A; Taylor B; Guerrero-Urbano T; Van Hemelrijck M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Jan; 19(1):20. PubMed ID: 33451330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.
DuBenske LL; Schrager SB; Hitchcock ME; Kane AK; Little TA; McDowell HE; Burnside ES
J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1805-1814. PubMed ID: 30030738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A scoping review of patient discharge from intensive care: opportunities and tools to improve care.
Stelfox HT; Lane D; Boyd JM; Taylor S; Perrier L; Straus S; Zygun D; Zuege DJ
Chest; 2015 Feb; 147(2):317-327. PubMed ID: 25210942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Management of Anemia: A Scoping Review.
Staibano P; Perelman I; Lombardi J; Davis A; Tinmouth A; Carrier M; Stevenson C; Saidenberg E
Transfus Med Rev; 2019 Jan; 33(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 30100259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
