461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25888786)
1. Stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary lesions: comparison of different dose calculation algorithms for Oncentra MasterPlan®.
Troeller A; Garny S; Pachmann S; Kantz S; Gerum S; Manapov F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Söhn M
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 10():51. PubMed ID: 25888786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical Note: Dosimetric evaluation of Monte Carlo algorithm in iPlan for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for lung cancer patients using RTOG 0813 parameters.
Pokhrel D; Badkul R; Jiang H; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5058. PubMed ID: 25679161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Various Dose Normalization Strategies When Implementing Linear Boltzmann Transport Equation Dose Calculation for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning.
Erickson BG; Ackerson BG; Kelsey CR; Yin FF; Adamson J; Cui Y
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2022; 12(5):446-456. PubMed ID: 35219882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of lung tumors: a comparison of absolute dose and dose distribution between pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms based on actual patient CT scans.
Chen H; Lohr F; Fritz P; Wenz F; Dobler B; Lorenz F; Mühlnickel W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):955-63. PubMed ID: 20171796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric errors during treatment of centrally located lung tumors with stereotactic body radiation therapy: Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity corrections.
Altunbas C; Kavanagh B; Dzingle W; Stuhr K; Gaspar L; Miften M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24119416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pencil beam-based homogeneous vs inhomogeneous target dose planning for stereotactic body radiotherapy of peripheral lung tumors through Monte Carlo-based recalculation.
Ohtakara K; Hoshi H
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 25776903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhao Y; Qi G; Yin G; Wang X; Wang P; Li J; Xiao M; Li J; Kang S; Liao X
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():287. PubMed ID: 25511623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam.
Koelbl O; Krieger T; Haedinger U; Sauer O; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive dosimetric study on switching from a Type-B to a Type-C dose algorithm for modern lung SBRT.
Zhou C; Bennion N; Ma R; Liang X; Wang S; Zvolanek K; Hyun M; Li X; Zhou S; Zhen W; Lin C; Wahl A; Zheng D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 May; 12(1):80. PubMed ID: 28476138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy using 4D CT and multiphase CT images for treatment planning of lung cancer: evaluation of the impact on daily dose coverage.
Wang L; Hayes S; Paskalev K; Jin L; Buyyounouski MK; Ma CC; Feigenberg S
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 19111362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT.
Liu H; Zhuang T; Stephans K; Videtic G; Raithel S; Djemil T; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):91–99. PubMed ID: 26699560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for subcentimeter lung tumors: clinical, dosimetric, and image guidance considerations.
Louie AV; Senan S; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(4):843-9. PubMed ID: 25585783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of two arc-based stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for early-stage lung cancer.
Liu H; Ye J; Kim JJ; Deng J; Kaur MS; Chen ZJ
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 25499078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets.
Haedinger U; Krieger T; Flentje M; Wulf J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):239-49. PubMed ID: 15629617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
