207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25889076)
1. A mixed methods study of how clinician 'super users' influence others during the implementation of electronic health records.
Yuan CT; Bradley EH; Nembhard IM
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Apr; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25889076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mapping communication spaces: The development and use of a tool for analyzing the impact of EHRs on interprofessional collaborative practice.
Rashotte J; Varpio L; Day K; Kuziemsky C; Parush A; Elliott-Miller P; King JW; Roffey T
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Sep; 93():2-13. PubMed ID: 27435942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing for privacy management in hospitals: Understanding the gap between user activities and IT staff's understandings.
Eikey EV; Murphy AR; Reddy MC; Xu H
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Dec; 84(12):1065-75. PubMed ID: 26467571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The EHR and building the patient's story: A qualitative investigation of how EHR use obstructs a vital clinical activity.
Varpio L; Rashotte J; Day K; King J; Kuziemsky C; Parush A
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Dec; 84(12):1019-28. PubMed ID: 26432683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Users' perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study.
McGinn CA; Gagnon MP; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Abdeljelil AB; Légaré F
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Sep; 12():105. PubMed ID: 22967231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.
McGinn CA; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Légaré F; Gagnon MP
BMC Med; 2011 Apr; 9():46. PubMed ID: 21524315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experiences with electronic health records: early adopters in long-term care facilities.
Cherry BJ; Ford EW; Peterson LT
Health Care Manage Rev; 2011; 36(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 21646885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
Cresswell K; Morrison Z; Crowe S; Robertson A; Sheikh A
Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(4):191-206. PubMed ID: 22828574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cancer care electronic medical record highly integrated into clinicians' workflow: users' attitudes pre-post implementation.
Sicotte C; Clavel S; Fortin MA
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 Nov; 26(6):. PubMed ID: 27454341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Staff expectations for the implementation of an electronic health record system: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory.
McCrorie C; Benn J; Johnson OA; Scantlebury A
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Nov; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 31727063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinician in the driver's seat: part 2 - intelligent uses of space in a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record.
Senathirajah Y; Kaufman D; Bakken S
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Dec; 52():177-88. PubMed ID: 25445921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between super users' attitudes and employee experiences with clinical information systems.
Halbesleben JR; Wakefield DS; Ward MM; Brokel J; Crandall D
Med Care Res Rev; 2009 Feb; 66(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 19047764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between evidence-based training and clinician proficiency in electronic health record use.
Hollister-Meadows L; Richesson RL; De Gagne J; Rawlins N
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Mar; 28(4):824-831. PubMed ID: 33575787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceived efficiency impacts following electronic health record implementation: an exploratory study of an urban community health center network.
McAlearney AS; Robbins J; Hirsch A; Jorina M; Harrop JP
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Dec; 79(12):807-16. PubMed ID: 20961803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consenting for contact? Linking electronic health records to a research register within psychosis services, a mixed method study.
Robotham D; Riches S; Perdue I; Callard F; Craig T; Rose D; Wykes T
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 May; 15():199. PubMed ID: 25971412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bringing service design to the development of health information systems: The case of the Portuguese national electronic health record.
Grenha Teixeira J; Pinho NF; Patrício L
Int J Med Inform; 2019 Dec; 132():103942. PubMed ID: 31627031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England.
Takian A; Sheikh A; Barber N
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Dec; 12():484. PubMed ID: 23272770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attitudes of Mental Health Service Users Toward Storage and Use of Electronic Health Records.
Bakken V; Koposov R; Røst TB; Clausen C; Nytrø Ø; Leventhal B; Westbye OS; Koochakpour K; Mandahl A; Hafstad H; Skokauskas N
Psychiatr Serv; 2022 Sep; 73(9):1013-1018. PubMed ID: 35291817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
