These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25889201)

  • 1. The influence of push-off timing in a robotic ankle-foot prosthesis on the energetics and mechanics of walking.
    Malcolm P; Quesada RE; Caputo JM; Collins SH
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 12():21. PubMed ID: 25889201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Once-per-step control of ankle-foot prosthesis push-off work reduces effort associated with balance during walking.
    Kim M; Collins SH
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():43. PubMed ID: 25928176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing the metabolic cost of walking with an ankle exoskeleton: interaction between actuation timing and power.
    Galle S; Malcolm P; Collins SH; De Clercq D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):35. PubMed ID: 28449684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing ankle push-off work with a powered prosthesis does not necessarily reduce metabolic rate for transtibial amputees.
    Quesada RE; Caputo JM; Collins SH
    J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3452-3459. PubMed ID: 27702444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosthetic ankle push-off work reduces metabolic rate but not collision work in non-amputee walking.
    Caputo JM; Collins SH
    Sci Rep; 2014 Dec; 4():7213. PubMed ID: 25467389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Step-to-step transition work during level and inclined walking using passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses.
    Russell Esposito E; Aldridge Whitehead JM; Wilken JM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 25628378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An experimental comparison of the relative benefits of work and torque assistance in ankle exoskeletons.
    Jackson RW; Collins SH
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2015 Sep; 119(5):541-57. PubMed ID: 26159764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
    Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic variation of prosthetic foot spring affects center-of-mass mechanics and metabolic cost during walking.
    Zelik KE; Collins SH; Adamczyk PG; Segal AD; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Kuo AD
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Aug; 19(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 21708509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recycling energy to restore impaired ankle function during human walking.
    Collins SH; Kuo AD
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9307. PubMed ID: 20174659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Powered ankle exoskeletons reveal the metabolic cost of plantar flexor mechanical work during walking with longer steps at constant step frequency.
    Sawicki GS; Ferris DP
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Jan; 212(Pt 1):21-31. PubMed ID: 19088207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-to-step transition cost.
    Wezenberg D; Cutti AG; Bruno A; Houdijk H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1579-90. PubMed ID: 25860285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical and energetic consequences of reduced ankle plantar-flexion in human walking.
    Huang TW; Shorter KA; Adamczyk PG; Kuo AD
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Nov; 218(Pt 22):3541-50. PubMed ID: 26385330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical walking mechanisms underlying the metabolic reduction caused by an autonomous exoskeleton.
    Mooney LM; Herr HM
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Jan; 13():4. PubMed ID: 26817449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanics and energetics of incline walking with robotic ankle exoskeletons.
    Sawicki GS; Ferris DP
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Jan; 212(Pt 1):32-41. PubMed ID: 19088208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of ankle stiffness on mechanics and energetics of walking with added loads: a prosthetic emulator study.
    Hedrick EA; Malcolm P; Wilken JM; Takahashi KZ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 16(1):148. PubMed ID: 31752942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Emulator Capable of Modulating Center of Pressure.
    Chiu VL; Voloshina AS; Collins SH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 67(1):166-176. PubMed ID: 30969914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons.
    Sawicki GS; Ferris DP
    J Exp Biol; 2008 May; 211(Pt 9):1402-13. PubMed ID: 18424674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Altering the tuning parameter settings of a commercial powered prosthetic foot to increase power during push-off may not reduce collisional work in the intact limb during gait.
    Davidson AM; Childers WL; Chang YH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Oct; 45(5):410-416. PubMed ID: 34469940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of toe joint stiffness and toe shape on walking biomechanics.
    Honert EC; Bastas G; Zelik KE
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 Oct; 13(6):066007. PubMed ID: 30187893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.