These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25889502)

  • 1. Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination.
    Helfer B; Prosser A; Samara MT; Geddes JR; Cipriani A; Davis JM; Mavridis D; Salanti G; Leucht S
    BMC Med; 2015 Apr; 13():82. PubMed ID: 25889502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Citation of previous meta-analyses on the same topic: a clue to perpetuation of incorrect methods?
    Li T; Dickersin K
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1113-9. PubMed ID: 23522971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research: A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis.
    Zhang Y; Huang J; Du L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Feb; 96(6):e4822. PubMed ID: 28178120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review.
    Bafeta A; Trinquart L; Seror R; Ravaud P
    BMJ; 2013 Jul; 347():f3675. PubMed ID: 23818558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology.
    Chen H; Jhanji V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):896-9. PubMed ID: 22446144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Elbert NJ; van Os-Medendorp H; van Renselaar W; Ekeland AG; Hakkaart-van Roijen L; Raat H; Nijsten TE; Pasmans SG
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Apr; 16(4):e110. PubMed ID: 24739471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
    Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doubling the impact: publication of systematic review articles in orthopaedic journals.
    Bhandari M; Montori VM; Devereaux PJ; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 May; 86(5):1012-6. PubMed ID: 15118046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topics and PRISMA Checklist Compliance for Meta-analyses in Dermatology: Journal Case Study.
    Poveda-Montoyo I; Belinchón-Romero I; Romero-Pérez D; Ramos-Rincón JM
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Dec; 27(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 31969243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dentistry.
    Gogos C; Kodonas K; Fardi A; Economides N
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2020 Mar; 78(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 31418611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heterogeneity assessment in gastroenterology systematic reviews: an analysis of current practices.
    Heavener T; Richards J; Bird H; Vassar M
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 29176428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.