These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25889535)

  • 1. GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates' performance in 2014.
    Mercer A; Crotty B; Alldridge L; Le L; Vele V
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():31. PubMed ID: 25889535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 14():31. PubMed ID: 24528509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative predictive value of undergraduate versus graduate selection tools in two Australian medical schools.
    Mercer A; Hay M; Hodgson WC; Canny BJ; Puddey IB
    Med Teach; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1183-1190. PubMed ID: 29355058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A selection test for Australian graduate-entry medical schools.
    Aldous CJ; Leeder SR; Price J; Sefton AE; Teubner JK
    Med J Aust; 1997 Mar; 166(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9076269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: A longitudinal cohort study.
    Adam J; Bore M; Childs R; Dunn J; Mckendree J; Munro D; Powis D
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(9):868-80. PubMed ID: 25665628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for medical school selection: What are prospective doctors' experiences and perceptions of the GAMSAT and what are the consequences of testing?
    Kumar K; Roberts C; Bartle E; Eley DS
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):533-546. PubMed ID: 29388087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school.
    Roberts C; Walton M; Rothnie I; Crossley J; Lyon P; Kumar K; Tiller D
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 18338992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of accelerated, graduate-entry medicine courses: a comparison of profile, success, and specialty destination between graduate entrants to accelerated or standard medicine courses in UK.
    Garrud P; McManus IC
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):250. PubMed ID: 30400933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. James Cook University's rurally orientated medical school selection process: quality graduates and positive workforce outcomes.
    Ray RA; Woolley T; Sen Gupta T
    Rural Remote Health; 2015; 15(4):3424. PubMed ID: 26442581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think?
    Groves MA; Gordon J; Ryan G
    Med J Aust; 2007 Feb; 186(3):120-3. PubMed ID: 17309399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does practice make perfect? The effect of coaching and retesting on selection tests used for admission to an Australian medical school.
    Griffin B; Harding DW; Wilson IG; Yeomans ND
    Med J Aust; 2008 Sep; 189(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 18759725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prior degree and academic performance in medical school: evidence for prioritising health students and moving away from a bio-medical science-focused entry stream.
    Aston-Mourney K; McLeod J; Rivera LR; McNeill BA; Baldi DL
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Oct; 22(1):700. PubMed ID: 36195862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Admission interview scores are associated with clinical performance in an undergraduate physiotherapy course: an observational study.
    Edgar S; Mercer A; Hamer P
    Physiotherapy; 2014 Dec; 100(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 24788231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between school type and academic performance at medical school: a national, multi-cohort study.
    Kumwenda B; Cleland JA; Walker K; Lee AJ; Greatrix R
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016291. PubMed ID: 28860227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools.
    Sladek RM; Bond MJ; Frost LK; Prior KN
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 16():187. PubMed ID: 27450570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative progress and academic performance of graduate vs undergraduate entrants to an Australian medical school.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A; Carr SE
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):159. PubMed ID: 31113431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Socio-economic predictors of performance in the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT).
    Puddey IB; Mercer A
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Nov; 13():155. PubMed ID: 24286571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practice effects in medical school entrance testing with the undergraduate medicine and health sciences admission test (UMAT).
    Puddey IB; Mercer A; Andrich D; Styles I
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Mar; 14():48. PubMed ID: 24618021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health sciences and medical college preadmission criteria and prediction of in-course academic performance: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Al Alwan I; Al Kushi M; Tamim H; Magzoub M; Elzubeir M
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 22669557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of Osteopathic Medical School Performance on the basis of MCAT score, GPA, sex, undergraduate major, and undergraduate institution.
    Dixon D
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2012 Apr; 112(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 22522516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.