These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25889619)

  • 21. A comparison of two search methods for determining the scope of systematic reviews and health technology assessments.
    Forsetlund L; Kirkehei I; Harboe I; Odgaard-Jensen J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 22617737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: HOW EXTENSIVE ARE THEIR SEARCHES?
    Wood H; Arber M; Glanville JM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28343452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How well do search filters perform in identifying economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Glanville J; Kaunelis D; Mensinkai S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 19845982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking.
    Preston L; Carroll C; Gardois P; Paisley S; Kaltenthaler E
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():82. PubMed ID: 26113080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A checklist to assess database-hosting platforms for designing and running searches for systematic reviews.
    Bethel A; Rogers M
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Mar; 31(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 24751228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?
    Booth A; Carroll C
    Health Info Libr J; 2015 Sep; 32(3):220-35. PubMed ID: 26095232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What you see depends on where you sit: The effect of geographical location on web-searching for systematic reviews: A case study.
    Cooper C; Lorenc T; Schauberger U
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):557-570. PubMed ID: 33713573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Searching the scientific literature: implications for quantitative and qualitative reviews.
    Wu YP; Aylward BS; Roberts MC; Evans SC
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2012 Aug; 32(6):553-7. PubMed ID: 22819996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen.
    Prady SL; Uphoff EP; Power M; Golder S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):106. PubMed ID: 30314471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surfing for suicide methods and help: content analysis of websites retrieved with search engines in Austria and the United States.
    Till B; Niederkrotenthaler T
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2014 Aug; 75(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 25099284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing image search behaviour in the ARRS GoldMiner search engine and a clinical PACS/RIS.
    De-Arteaga M; Eggel I; Do B; Rubin D; Kahn CE; Müller H
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():57-64. PubMed ID: 26002820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
    Wright K; Golder S; Rodriguez-Lopez R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():73. PubMed ID: 24893958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
    Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The "realist search": A systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting.
    Booth A; Briscoe S; Wright JM
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jan; 11(1):14-35. PubMed ID: 31714016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Information contained in miscarriage-related websites and the predictive value of website scoring systems.
    Hardwick JC; MacKenzie FM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jan; 106(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 12475583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.