260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25889698)
1. Evaluation of the anesthetic effect of epinephrine-free articaine and mepivacaine through quantitative sensory testing.
Said Yekta-Michael S; Stein JM; Marioth-Wirtz E
Head Face Med; 2015 Feb; 11():2. PubMed ID: 25889698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
Colombini BL; Modena KC; Calvo AM; Sakai VT; Giglio FP; Dionísio TJ; Trindade AS; Lauris JR; Santos CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16876058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of epinephrine-free articaine compared to articaine with epinephrine (1:100 000) for maxillary infiltration, a randomised clinical trial.
Paterakis K; Schmitter M; Said Yekta-Michael S
J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 45(6):467-475. PubMed ID: 29663492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiovascular effect of dental anesthesia with articaine (40 mg with epinefrine 0,5 mg % and 40 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) versus mepivacaine (30 mg and 20 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) in medically compromised cardiac patients: a cross-over, randomized, single blinded study.
Torres-Lagares D; Serrera-Figallo MÁ; Machuca-Portillo G; Corcuera-Flores JR; Machuca-Portillo C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Jul; 17(4):e655-60. PubMed ID: 22322521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic.
Rosenberg PA; Amin KG; Zibari Y; Lin LM
J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 17368327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and mepivacaine in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind study.
Odabaş ME; Cınar C; Deveci C; Alaçam A
Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 22353456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
Santos CF; Modena KC; Giglio FP; Sakai VT; Calvo AM; Colombini BL; Sipert CR; Dionísio TJ; Faria FA; Trindade AS; Lauris JR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2445-52. PubMed ID: 18022467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Injection pain of prilocaine plain, mepivacaine plain, articaine with epinephrine, and lidocaine with epinephrine.
Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 16776407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and without epinephrine in inferior alveolar block for tooth extraction: double-blind randomized clinical trial of anesthetic efficacy.
Kämmerer PW; Palarie V; Daubländer M; Bicer C; Shabazfar N; Brüllmann D; Al-Nawas B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Apr; 113(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 22676931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block.
Batista da Silva C; Berto LA; Volpato MC; Ramacciato JC; Motta RH; Ranali J; Groppo FC
J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):438-41. PubMed ID: 20171359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration.
Costa CG; Tortamano IP; Rocha RG; Francischone CE; Tortamano N
Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 15887505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration in the mandibular first molar.
McEntire M; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):450-4. PubMed ID: 21419288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Mason R; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19720211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block.
Berberich G; Reader A; Drum M; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1498-504. PubMed ID: 19840637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Evans G; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 18358883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the maxillary high tuberosity second division nerve block.
Forloine A; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1770-7. PubMed ID: 20951285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
