BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25890013)

  • 1. A comparative assessment of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional ultrasound and cone beam CT.
    Li M; Ballhausen H; Hegemann NS; Ganswindt U; Manapov F; Tritschler S; Roosen A; Gratzke C; Reiner M; Belka C
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():82. PubMed ID: 25890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT.
    Li M; Ballhausen H; Hegemann NS; Reiner M; Tritschler S; Gratzke C; Manapov F; Corradini S; Ganswindt U; Belka C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Mar; 193(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 27928626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyses of the factors influencing the accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in comparison with cone-beam CT in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation.
    Zhou S; Luo L; Li J; Lin M; Chen L; Shao J; Lu S; Ma Y; Zhang Y; Chen W; Liu M; Liu S; He L
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):22. PubMed ID: 30696488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linearity of patient positioning detection : a phantom study of skin markers, cone beam computed tomography, and 3D ultrasound.
    Ballhausen H; Hieber S; Li M; Parodi K; Belka C; Reiner M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2015 May; 191(5):442-7. PubMed ID: 25633164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of CBCT-based prostate setup correction strategies and impact of rectal distension.
    Boydev C; Taleb-Ahmed A; Derraz F; Peyrodie L; Thiran JP; Pasquier D
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():83. PubMed ID: 25890308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.
    Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.
    Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PTV margin definition in hypofractionated IGRT of localized prostate cancer using cone beam CT and orthogonal image pairs with fiducial markers.
    Oehler C; Lang S; Dimmerling P; Bolesch C; Kloeck S; Tini A; Glanzmann C; Najafi Y; Studer G; Zwahlen DR
    Radiat Oncol; 2014 Nov; 9():229. PubMed ID: 25384898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
    Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PTV margin analysis for prostate patients treated with initial pelvic nodal IMRT and prostate proton boost.
    Su Z; Li Z; Henderson R; Hoppe B; Nichols RC; Bryant C; Mendenhall W; Mendenhall N
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(4):04NT04. PubMed ID: 30630135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testicular doses in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
    Deng J; Chen Z; Yu JB; Roberts KB; Peschel RE; Nath R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jan; 82(1):e39-47. PubMed ID: 21489702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial results for patient setup verification using transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT in external beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
    Richter A; Polat B; Lawrenz I; Weick S; Sauer O; Flentje M; Mantel F
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):147. PubMed ID: 27825386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of daily patient positioning for radiotherapy with a commercial 3D surface-imaging system (Catalyst™).
    Walter F; Freislederer P; Belka C; Heinz C; Söhn M; Roeder F
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):154. PubMed ID: 27881158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients.
    Böckelmann F; Putz F; Kallis K; Lettmaier S; Fietkau R; Bert C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Jul; 196(7):647-656. PubMed ID: 32157345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it essential to use fiducial markers during cone-beam CT-based radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients?
    Yildirim BA; Onal C; Dolek Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 27730453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Superiority of a soft tissue-based setup using cone-beam computed tomography over a bony structure-based setup in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    Sato H; Abe E; Utsunomiya S; Kaidu M; Yamana N; Tanaka K; Ohta A; Obinata M; Liu J; Kawaguchi G; Maruyama K; Ayukawa F; Aoyama H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):239–245. PubMed ID: 26699304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    Tanabe S; Utsunomiya S; Abe E; Sato H; Ohta A; Sakai H; Yamada T; Kaidu M; Aoyama H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):53-59. PubMed ID: 31054217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of rectal distension on prostate CBCT-based positioning assessed with 6 degrees-of-freedom couch.
    Charret J; Salleron J; Quivrin M; Mazoyer F; Lesueur P; Martin E; Peiffert D; Créhange G
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(5):e322-e328. PubMed ID: 29706305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems: A clinical study for prostate and head-and-neck cancer.
    Dzierma Y; Beyhs M; Palm J; Niewald M; Bell K; Nuesken F; Licht N; Rübe C
    Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1055-1059. PubMed ID: 26476789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image guidance during head-and-neck cancer radiation therapy: analysis of alignment trends with in-room cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Zumsteg Z; DeMarco J; Lee SP; Steinberg ML; Lin CS; McBride W; Lin K; Wang PC; Kupelian P; Lee P
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):712-9. PubMed ID: 22099037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.