These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25890826)

  • 1. Designing a new test for contrast sensitivity function measurement with iPad.
    Rodríguez-Vallejo M; Remón L; Monsoriu JA; Furlan WD
    J Optom; 2015; 8(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 25890826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad.
    Dorr M; Lesmes LA; Lu ZL; Bex PJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Nov; 54(12):7266-73. PubMed ID: 24114545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pilot trial of the iPad tablet computer as a portable device for visual acuity testing.
    Zhang ZT; Zhang SC; Huang XG; Liang LY
    J Telemed Telecare; 2013 Jan; 19(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 23434538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and testing of an automated computer tablet-based method for self-testing of high and low contrast near visual acuity in ophthalmic patients.
    Aslam TM; Parry NR; Murray IJ; Salleh M; Col CD; Mirza N; Czanner G; Tahir HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):891-9. PubMed ID: 26899899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.
    Kollbaum PS; Jansen ME; Kollbaum EJ; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 91(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24413274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement analysis comparing iPad LCVA and Sloan testing in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Sattarnezhad N; Farrow S; Kimbrough D; Glanz B; Healy B; Chitnis T
    Mult Scler; 2018 Jul; 24(8):1126-1130. PubMed ID: 28585909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast sensitivity measured by two different test methods in healthy, young adults with normal visual acuity.
    Koefoed VF; Baste V; Roumes C; Høvding G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 93(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 25056525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normative values for a tablet computer-based application to assess chromatic contrast sensitivity.
    Bodduluri L; Boon MY; Ryan M; Dain SJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):673-683. PubMed ID: 28411334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the VCTS-6500 and the CSV-1000 tests for visual contrast sensitivity testing.
    Franco S; Silva AC; Carvalho AS; Macedo AS; Lira M
    Neurotoxicology; 2010 Dec; 31(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 20600292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity function using contrast sweep visual evoked responses.
    Lopes de Faria JM; Katsumi O; Arai M; Hirose T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Feb; 82(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 9613384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of a computerised visual acuity measurement device in subjects with age-related macular degeneration: comparison with gold standard ETDRS chart measurements.
    Bokinni Y; Shah N; Maguire O; Laidlaw DA
    Eye (Lond); 2015 Aug; 29(8):1085-91. PubMed ID: 26043703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Determination of far vision with DIN 58220 (criterion 6/10): computer vision test with high resolution monitor in comparison with vision charts].
    Hautzinger S; Haase W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Dec; 211(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 9498189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of the contrast sensitivity card test for infants: retest variability and prediction of spatial resolution.
    Drover JR; Courage ML; Dalton SM; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 16614578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual contrast sensitivity testing: a comparison of two F.A.C.T. test types.
    Hitchcock EM; Dick RB; Krieg EF
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 15019960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of tablet computers for visual function assessment.
    Bodduluri L; Boon MY; Dain SJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):548-558. PubMed ID: 27004485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An assessment of a modern touch-screen tablet computer with reference to core physical characteristics necessary for clinical vision testing.
    Aslam TM; Murray IJ; Lai MY; Linton E; Tahir HJ; Parry NR
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Jul; 10(84):20130239. PubMed ID: 23658115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of visual acuity measurements taken with a notebook and a tablet computer in participants who were illiterate to Roman characters.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Sudsakorn N; Somkijrungroj T; Engkagul C; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Mar; 95 Suppl 3():S109-16. PubMed ID: 22619896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.