These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25891997)

  • 1. Statistical aspects of modeling the labor curve.
    Zhang J; Troendle J; Grantz KL; Reddy UM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):750.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25891997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women.
    Zhang J; Troendle JF; Yancey MK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):824-8. PubMed ID: 12388957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New labor curves of dilation and station to improve the accuracy of predicting labor progress.
    Hamilton EF; Zhoroev T; Warrick PA; Tarca AL; Garite TJ; Caughey AB; Melillo J; Prasad M; Neilson D; Singson P; McKay K; Romero R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 231(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 38423450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of the labor curve and its implications for clinical practice: the relationship between cervical dilation, station, and time during labor.
    Hamilton EF; Romero R; Tarca AL; Warrick PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5S):S1050-S1062. PubMed ID: 37164488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misguided guidelines for managing labor.
    Cohen WR; Friedman EA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):753.e1-3. PubMed ID: 25891996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normal labor curve in twin gestation.
    Hochler H; Guedalia J; Lipschuetz M; Walfisch A; Yagel S; Guedalia Friedman E; Unger R; Sergienko R; Yoles I; Kabiri D; Cohen SM; Sheiner E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):546.e1-546.e11. PubMed ID: 34363782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perils of the new labor management guidelines: Should we stop asking "when" to act on delayed progression and start asking "why" the cervical dilatation is slower than the expected labor curve?
    Ferrazzi E; Paganelli A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):139-40. PubMed ID: 26541223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perils of the new labor management guidelines.
    Cohen WR; Friedman EA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 212(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 25218127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the labor curves with and without combined spinal-epidural analgesia in nulliparous women- a retrospective study.
    Ando H; Makino S; Takeda J; Maruyama Y; Nojiri S; Sumikura H; Itakura A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Aug; 20(1):467. PubMed ID: 32799848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical Dilatation Curves of Spontaneous Deliveries in Pregnant Japanese Females.
    Inde Y; Nakai A; Sekiguchi A; Hayashi M; Takeshita T
    Int J Med Sci; 2018; 15(6):549-556. PubMed ID: 29725244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spontaneous labor curve based on a retrospective multi-center study in Japan.
    Shindo R; Aoki S; Misumi T; Nakanishi S; Umazume T; Nagamatsu T; Masuyama H; Itakura A; Ikeda T;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Dec; 47(12):4263-4269. PubMed ID: 34622514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis of labor progression characteristics of 1 089 nulliparas managed by the new partogram].
    Shen LX; Chen HT; Li ZY; Wang ZL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 54(2):93-96. PubMed ID: 30803167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Labour curve findings associated with fourth degree sphincter disruption: the impact of labour progression on perineal trauma.
    Nguyen T; Handa VL; Hueppchen N; Cundiff GW
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Jan; 32(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 20370971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of analysis technique on our understanding of the natural history of labour: a simulation study.
    de Vries BS; Mcdonald S; Joseph FA; Morton R; Hyett JA; Phipps H; McGeechan K
    BJOG; 2021 Oct; 128(11):1833-1842. PubMed ID: 33837643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.
    Zhang J; Landy HJ; Ware Branch D; Burkman R; Haberman S; Gregory KD; Hatjis CG; Ramirez MM; Bailit JL; Gonzalez-Quintero VH; Hibbard JU; Hoffman MK; Kominiarek M; Learman LA; Van Veldhuisen P; Troendle J; Reddy UM;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 116(6):1281-1287. PubMed ID: 21099592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Middle-East OBGYN graduate education (MOGGE) foundation practice guidelines: use of labor charts in management of labor. Practice guideline no. 04-O-21.
    Shazly SA; Shawki AA; Ahmed MM; Monib FA; Radwan AA; Sedik AS; Said AE; Ali SS; Abouzeid MH; Sayed EG; Nassr AA; Eltaweel NA; Hortu I; Hassan RM; Abdelbadie AS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7280-7289. PubMed ID: 34470117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New insights on labor progression: a systematic review.
    He X; Zeng X; Troendle J; Ahlberg M; Tilden EL; Souza JP; Bernitz S; Duan T; Oladapo OT; Fraser W; Zhang J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5S):S1063-S1094. PubMed ID: 37164489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term.
    Impey L; Hobson J; O'herlihy C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 10942483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of labor using a new type partogram compared to the classical Fisher partogram.
    Galazios G; Tica V; Vrachnis N; Vlachos G; Zervoudis S; Ceausu I; Trypsianis G; Zographou C; Tsikouras P
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 24635455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor.
    Zhang J; Troendle J; Mikolajczyk R; Sundaram R; Beaver J; Fraser W
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 115(4):705-710. PubMed ID: 20308828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.