241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25892052)
1. Role of digital tomosynthesis and dual energy subtraction digital radiography in detecting pulmonary nodules.
Kumar SG; Garg MK; Khandelwal N; Gupta P; Gupta D; Aggarwal AN; Bansal SC
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1383-91. PubMed ID: 25892052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
Gomi T; Nozaki M; Takeda T; Umeda T; Takahashi K; Nakajima M
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24119347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of digital tomosynthesis and dual energy subtraction digital radiography in detection of parenchymal lesions in active pulmonary tuberculosis.
Sharma M; Sandhu MS; Gorsi U; Gupta D; Khandelwal N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1820-7. PubMed ID: 26071244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.
Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules.
Dobbins JT; McAdams HP; Sabol JM; Chakraborty DP; Kazerooni EA; Reddy GP; Vikgren J; Båth M
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):236-250. PubMed ID: 27439324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nomori H; Yamashita Y
Clin Radiol; 2010 Aug; 65(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 20599062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography improves performance of a next generation computer-aided detection program.
Balkman JD; Mehandru S; DuPont E; Novak RD; Gilkeson RC
J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20160602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The advantage of digital tomosynthesis for pulmonary nodule detection concerning influence of nodule location and size: a phantom study.
Kim EY; Bista AB; Kim T; Park SY; Park KJ; Kang DK; Sun JS
Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):796.e1-796.e8. PubMed ID: 28454640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital tomosynthesis of the thorax: the influence of respiratory motion artifacts on lung nodule detection.
Kim SM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Kang H; Song IY; Lee EJ; Hwang HS
Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 23528563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is Digital Tomosynthesis on Par With Computed Tomography for the Detection and Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules?
Lee XW; Marshall HM; Leong SC; O'Rourke RL; Steinke K; Mirjalili N; Bowman RV; Yang IA; Fong KM
J Thorac Imaging; 2017 Nov; 32(6):W67-W68. PubMed ID: 28914745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of chest radiography, chest digital tomosynthesis and low dose MDCT to detect small ground-glass opacity nodules: an anthropomorphic chest phantom study.
Doo KW; Kang EY; Yong HS; Ham SY; Lee KY; Choo JY
Eur Radiol; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3269-76. PubMed ID: 25097138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography for lung nodule detection: results of an international multicenter trial.
Rühl R; Wozniak MM; Werk M; Laurent F; Mager G; Montaudon M; Pattermann A; Scherrer A; Tasu JP; Pech M; Ricke J
Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1831-9. PubMed ID: 18425520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules: diagnostic performance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector-row computed tomography as the reference.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hasegawa I; Shiomi E; Sugiura H; Abe T; Sato Y; Kuribayashi S; Ogawa K
Invest Radiol; 2011 Aug; 46(8):471-7. PubMed ID: 21487302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a high-performance dual-energy chest imaging system: initial investigation of diagnostic performance.
Kashani H; Gang JG; Shkumat NA; Varon CA; Yorkston J; Van Metter R; Paul NS; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):464-76. PubMed ID: 19268859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Color radiography in lung nodule detection and characterization: comparison with conventional gray scale radiography.
Song I; Yi JG; Park JH; Lee KS; Chung MJ
BMC Med Imaging; 2016 Aug; 16(1):48. PubMed ID: 27549084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Patak MA; Yuksel-Hatz S; Ruder T; Vock P
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 17899105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 28(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 20437132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
