These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2589257)

  • 1. An evaluation of the changes in soft-tissue profile form induced by orthodontic therapy.
    Lavelle CL; Carvalho RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Dec; 96(6):467-76. PubMed ID: 2589257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A retrospective cephalometric study of Class I patients.
    Lavelle C
    Br J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 16(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 2923847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.
    Talass MF; Talass L; Baker RC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 3472457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment.
    Finnöy JP; Wisth PJ; Böe OE
    Eur J Orthod; 1987 Feb; 9(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 3470187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Hard and soft tissue profile changes and their relation to the maxillary protrusion of adult females treated with the Begg technic].
    Machida M
    Shigaku; 1984 Apr; 71(6):1036-62. PubMed ID: 6591080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cephalometric grid analysis of changes produced in facial morphology by different orthodontic technics].
    Palot C
    Orthod Fr; 1980; 51():1-124. PubMed ID: 6941151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial soft tissue features assessed with finite element analysis.
    Banabilh SM; Rajion ZA; Samsudin AR; Singh GD
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2006; 17(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 17256439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal effects in Angle Class II/1 patients treated with the functional regulator type II : Cephalometric and tensor analysis.
    Schulz S; Koos B; Duske K; Stahl F
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Nov; 77(6):420-431. PubMed ID: 27752709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in craniofacial size and shape with two modes of orthodontic treatment.
    Book D; Lavelle C
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1988; 8(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 3209684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes.
    Rathod AB; Araujo E; Vaden JL; Behrents RG; Oliver DR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 25919105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Oct; 76(4):423-42. PubMed ID: 291343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial soft tissue thickness in individuals with different occlusion patterns in adult Turkish subjects.
    Kurkcuoglu A; Pelin C; Ozener B; Zagyapan R; Sahinoglu Z; Yazici AC
    Homo; 2011 Aug; 62(4):288-97. PubMed ID: 21741647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. A cephalometric consideration of changes in the inter-incisal angle and soft tissue profile.
    Keating PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1986 Oct; 13(4):209-20. PubMed ID: 3465369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of craniofacial form; the need for new analytic techniques.
    Lavelle CL
    Anat Anz; 1985; 160(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 4083512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile.
    Looi LK; Mills JR
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 3459364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial variations related to headform type.
    Bhat M; Enlow DH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):269-80. PubMed ID: 3865565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of growth changes and treatment effects in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with conventional roentgenographic cephalometry and finite element method analysis.
    Cangialosi TJ; Moss ML; McAlarney ME; Nirenblatt BD; Yuan M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Feb; 105(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 8311037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in the soft tissue profile after extraction orthodontic therapy.
    Darendeliler N; Taner L
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 17367034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.