448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25893223)
21. Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging.
Manhart J; Trumm C
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 19937075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
Schuckar M; Geurtsen W
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
Kim ME; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of Cavity Margin Design and Restorative Material on Marginal Quality and Seal of Extended Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
Soliman S; Preidl R; Karl S; Hofmann N; Krastl G; Klaiber B
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 26814320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An in-vitro study of microleakage around class V cavities bonded with a self-etching material versus a conventional two-bottle system.
Salim S; Santini A; Husham A
Prim Dent Care; 2006 Jul; 13(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 16836814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of accelerated restorative techniques on the microleakage of Class II composites.
Uctasli S; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 12469751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration.
Kwon OH; Kim DH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 20672729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M
Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement.
Dietschi D; Monasevic M; Krejci I; Davidson C
J Dent; 2002; 30(5-6):259-69. PubMed ID: 12450717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
