951 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25893354)
1. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term clinical and radiological postoperative outcomes after an interspinous microdecompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Jalil Y; Carvalho C; Becker R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 24365893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach.
Papavero L; Thiel M; Fritzsche E; Kunze C; Westphal M; Kothe R
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):182-7; discussion187. PubMed ID: 19934993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion.
Fujii K; Kawamura N; Ikegami M; Niitsuma G; Kunogi J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):703-9. PubMed ID: 25394314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Komp M; Hahn P; Oezdemir S; Giannakopoulos A; Heikenfeld R; Kasch R; Merk H; Godolias G; Ruetten S
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 25675060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Outcomes and Radiologic Changes After Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression by a Unilateral Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.
Jang JW; Park JH; Hyun SJ; Rhim SC
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):268-71. PubMed ID: 23073148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Sasai K; Umeda M; Maruyama T; Wakabayashi E; Iida H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Dec; 9(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 19035747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of pelvic balance, physical activity, and fear-avoidance on the outcome after decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis.
Donnarumma P; Presaghi F; Tarantino R; Fragale M; Rullo M; Delfini R
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):428-433. PubMed ID: 27272492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression?
Morgalla MH; Noak N; Merkle M; Tatagiba MS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 21235300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
