212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25893918)
1. Matched Comparison of Two Different Biological Prostheses for Complete Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement.
Fiegl K; Deutsch MA; Rondak IC; Lange R; Guenzinger R
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 25893918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early haemodynamic performance of a latest generation supra-annular aortic bioprosthesis: experience from a large single-centre series.
Deutsch MA; Prinzing A; Fiegl K; Wottke M; Badiu CC; Krane M; Goppel G; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Lange R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1691-8. PubMed ID: 26656235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study.
Bavaria JE; Desai ND; Cheung A; Petracek MR; Groh MA; Borger MA; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):590-7. PubMed ID: 23477687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. St. Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valves for the treatment of aortic stenosis: comparison of early Doppler-echocardiography and hemodynamic performance.
Minardi G; Pergolini A; Zampi G; Pulignano G; Pero G; Sbaraglia F; Pino PG; Cioffi G; Musumeci F
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis; 2013 Sep; 80(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 24818319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The TRIBECA study: (TRI)fecta (B)ioprosthesis (E)valuation versus (C)arpentier Magna-Ease in (A)ortic position.
Colli A; Marchetto G; Salizzoni S; Rinaldi M; Di Marco L; Pacini D; Di Bartolomeo R; Nicolini F; Gherli T; Agrifoglio M; Borghetti V; Khoury G; De Paolis M; Zoffoli G; Mangino D; Amorim MJ; Manzan E; Zucchetta F; Balduzzi S; Gerosa G
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):478-85. PubMed ID: 25769464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves.
Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and St. Jude Medical Epic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement--a retrospective echocardiographic short-term study.
Goetzenich A; Langebartels G; Christiansen S; Hatam N; Autschbach R; Dohmen G
J Card Surg; 2009; 24(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 19438778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suture technique does not affect hemodynamic performance of the small supra-annular Trifecta bioprosthesis.
Ugur M; Byrne JG; Bavaria JE; Cheung A; Petracek M; Groh MA; Suri RM; Borger MA; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Oct; 148(4):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24518226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 53(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16037868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.
Clavel MA; Webb JG; Pibarot P; Altwegg L; Dumont E; Thompson C; De Larochellière R; Doyle D; Masson JB; Bergeron S; Bertrand OF; Rodés-Cabau J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 May; 53(20):1883-91. PubMed ID: 19442889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of early haemodynamics of 19-mm aortic valve bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Domoto S; Niinami H; Uwabe K; Koike H; Tabata M; Morita K; Kambe M; Iguchi A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 22(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 26467641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning?
Guenzinger R; Eichinger WB; Hettich I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka D; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 contemporary bioprosthetic aortic valves: should hemodynamic performance influence device selection?
Suri RM; Michelena HI; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Sundt TM; Li Z; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1387-95, 1398; discussion 1395-7. PubMed ID: 23140964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
