These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25893918)

  • 1. Matched Comparison of Two Different Biological Prostheses for Complete Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Fiegl K; Deutsch MA; Rondak IC; Lange R; Guenzinger R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 25893918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
    Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early haemodynamic performance of a latest generation supra-annular aortic bioprosthesis: experience from a large single-centre series.
    Deutsch MA; Prinzing A; Fiegl K; Wottke M; Badiu CC; Krane M; Goppel G; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Lange R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1691-8. PubMed ID: 26656235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study.
    Bavaria JE; Desai ND; Cheung A; Petracek MR; Groh MA; Borger MA; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):590-7. PubMed ID: 23477687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. St. Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valves for the treatment of aortic stenosis: comparison of early Doppler-echocardiography and hemodynamic performance.
    Minardi G; Pergolini A; Zampi G; Pulignano G; Pero G; Sbaraglia F; Pino PG; Cioffi G; Musumeci F
    Monaldi Arch Chest Dis; 2013 Sep; 80(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 24818319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The TRIBECA study: (TRI)fecta (B)ioprosthesis (E)valuation versus (C)arpentier Magna-Ease in (A)ortic position.
    Colli A; Marchetto G; Salizzoni S; Rinaldi M; Di Marco L; Pacini D; Di Bartolomeo R; Nicolini F; Gherli T; Agrifoglio M; Borghetti V; Khoury G; De Paolis M; Zoffoli G; Mangino D; Amorim MJ; Manzan E; Zucchetta F; Balduzzi S; Gerosa G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):478-85. PubMed ID: 25769464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
    Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical Trifecta and Epic Bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes M; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jun; 27(6):581-9. PubMed ID: 24534651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and St. Jude Medical Epic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement--a retrospective echocardiographic short-term study.
    Goetzenich A; Langebartels G; Christiansen S; Hatam N; Autschbach R; Dohmen G
    J Card Surg; 2009; 24(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 19438778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suture technique does not affect hemodynamic performance of the small supra-annular Trifecta bioprosthesis.
    Ugur M; Byrne JG; Bavaria JE; Cheung A; Petracek M; Groh MA; Suri RM; Borger MA; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Oct; 148(4):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24518226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 53(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16037868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.
    Clavel MA; Webb JG; Pibarot P; Altwegg L; Dumont E; Thompson C; De Larochellière R; Doyle D; Masson JB; Bergeron S; Bertrand OF; Rodés-Cabau J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 May; 53(20):1883-91. PubMed ID: 19442889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of early haemodynamics of 19-mm aortic valve bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Domoto S; Niinami H; Uwabe K; Koike H; Tabata M; Morita K; Kambe M; Iguchi A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 22(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 26467641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
    Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning?
    Guenzinger R; Eichinger WB; Hettich I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka D; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 contemporary bioprosthetic aortic valves: should hemodynamic performance influence device selection?
    Suri RM; Michelena HI; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Sundt TM; Li Z; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1387-95, 1398; discussion 1395-7. PubMed ID: 23140964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.