These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25894491)

  • 1. Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.
    Mora EC; Cobo-Cuan A; Macías-Escrivá F; Kössl M
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Jul; 201(7):657-66. PubMed ID: 25894491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Keeping up with bats: dynamic auditory tuning in a moth.
    Windmill JF; Jackson JC; Tuck EJ; Robert D
    Curr Biol; 2006 Dec; 16(24):2418-23. PubMed ID: 17174915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical tuning of the moth ear: distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and tympanal vibrations.
    Mora EC; Cobo-Cuan A; Macías-Escrivá F; Pérez M; Nowotny M; Kössl M
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Oct; 216(Pt 20):3863-72. PubMed ID: 23868848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bat-deafness in day-flying moths (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae, Dioptinae).
    Fullard JH; Dawson JW; Otero LD; Surlykke A
    J Comp Physiol A; 1997 Nov; 181(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 9373954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.
    Cobo-Cuan A; Kössl M; Mora EC
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Sep; 203(9):707-715. PubMed ID: 28421281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moth hearing and sound communication.
    Nakano R; Takanashi T; Surlykke A
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Jan; 201(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 25261361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High duty cycle pulses suppress orientation flights of crambid moths.
    Nakano R; Ihara F; Mishiro K; Toyama M; Toda S
    J Insect Physiol; 2015 Dec; 83():15-21. PubMed ID: 26549128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surviving cave bats: auditory and behavioural defences in the Australian noctuid moth, Speiredonia spectans.
    Fullard JH; Jackson ME; Jacobs DS; Pavey CR; Burwell CJ
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 24):3808-15. PubMed ID: 19043053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears having just one auditory neuron.
    Kössl M; Coro F; Seyfarth EA; Nässig WA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2007 Aug; 193(8):909-15. PubMed ID: 17572898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory encoding during the last moment of a moth's life.
    Fullard JH; Dawson JW; Jacobs DS
    J Exp Biol; 2003 Jan; 206(Pt 2):281-94. PubMed ID: 12477898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths.
    Dawson JW; Kutsch W; Robertson RM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 14655020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community.
    ter Hofstede HM; Goerlitz HR; Ratcliffe JM; Holderied MW; Surlykke A
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Nov; 216(Pt 21):3954-62. PubMed ID: 23913945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths.
    Rydell J; Skals N; Surlykke A; Svensson M
    Proc Biol Sci; 1997 Jan; 264(1378):83-8. PubMed ID: 9061963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tone-deaf ears in moths may limit the acoustic detection of two-tone bats.
    Mora EC; Fernández Y; Hechavarría J; Pérez M
    Brain Behav Evol; 2014; 83(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 24942265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus ratio dependence of low-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Christensen AT; Ordoñez R; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):679-89. PubMed ID: 25698003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.