386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25894808)
1. Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.
Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3867-75. PubMed ID: 25894808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.
Hannouche D; Devriese F; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Tourabaly I; Sedel L; Chevret S; Nizard R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.
Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?
Haefeli PC; Albers CE; Steppacher SD; Tannast M; Büchler L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1169-1177. PubMed ID: 27718121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.
Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Welten ML; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2385-92. PubMed ID: 15523007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cemented hip designs are a reasonable option in young patients.
Busch V; Klarenbeek R; Slooff T; Schreurs BW; Gardeniers J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3214-20. PubMed ID: 20405346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.
Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Cruz-Pardos A; Garcia-Rey E; Ortega-Chamarro J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3304-13. PubMed ID: 20499294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 21- to 27-year results of the Harris-Galante cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Kawamura H; Mishima H; Sugaya H; Nishino T; Shimizu Y; Miyakawa S
J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 26970833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acetabular re-revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup; a biological option for successive reconstructions.
Schreurs BW; Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW
Hip Int; 2015; 25(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 25362880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?
Hooper N; Sargeant H; Frampton C; Hooper G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.
van Egmond N; De Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):562-73. PubMed ID: 20931308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
