These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25894994)

  • 1. Combining latent class analysis labeling with multiclass approach for fetal heart rate categorization.
    Karvelis P; Spilka J; Georgoulas G; Chudáček V; Stylios CD; Lhotská L
    Physiol Meas; 2015 May; 36(5):1001-24. PubMed ID: 25894994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.
    Rhöse S; Heinis AM; Vandenbussche F; van Drongelen J; van Dillen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 24597920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three class treatment of the FHR classification problem using latent class analysis labeling.
    Georgoulas G; Spilka J; Karvelis P; Chudáček V; Stylios C; Lhotská L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():46-9. PubMed ID: 25569893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antepartum cardiotocography: a study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain.
    Romano M; Bracale M; Cesarelli M; Campanile M; Bifulco P; De Falco M; Sansone M; Di Lieto A
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 Jun; 36(6):619-33. PubMed ID: 16005863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of obstetricians' decision making on CTG recordings.
    Spilka J; Chudáček V; Janků P; Hruban L; Burša M; Huptych M; Zach L; Lhotská L
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Oct; 51():72-9. PubMed ID: 24747355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians.
    Hruban L; Spilka J; Chudáček V; Janků P; Huptych M; Burša M; Hudec A; Kacerovský M; Koucký M; Procházka M; Korečko V; Seget'a J; Šimetka O; Měchurová A; Lhotská L
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Aug; 21(4):694-702. PubMed ID: 26011725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A one-class approach to cardiotocogram assessment.
    Gavrilis D; Nikolakopoulos G; Georgoulas G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():518-21. PubMed ID: 26736313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of caesarean section and normal vaginal deliveries using foetal heart rate signals and advanced machine learning algorithms.
    Fergus P; Hussain A; Al-Jumeily D; Huang DS; Bouguila N
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jul; 16(1):89. PubMed ID: 28679415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings.
    Signorini MG; Magenes G; Cerutti S; Arduini D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 12669993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Open access intrapartum CTG database.
    Chudáček V; Spilka J; Burša M; Janků P; Hruban L; Huptych M; Lhotská L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jan; 14():16. PubMed ID: 24418387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ordinal classification approach for CTG categorization.
    Georgoulas G; Karvelis P; Gavrilis D; Stylios CD; Nikolakopoulos G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2642-2645. PubMed ID: 29060442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative assessment of fetal well-being through CTG recordings: a new parameter based on phase-rectified signal average.
    Fanelli A; Magenes G; Campanile M; Signorini MG
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2013 Sep; 17(5):959-66. PubMed ID: 25055375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An algorithm for the recovery of fetal heart rate series from CTG data.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P; Fedele F; Bracale M
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 May; 37(5):663-9. PubMed ID: 16893537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability in cardiotocography interpretation - impact of extended on-site education in addition to web-based learning: an observational study.
    Gyllencreutz E; Hulthén Varli I; Lindqvist PG; Holzmann M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 28052320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cardiotocography: A scoping review.
    Aeberhard JL; Radan AP; Delgado-Gonzalo R; Strahm KM; Sigurthorsdottir HB; Schneider S; Surbek D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():54-62. PubMed ID: 36535071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation.
    Palomäki O; Luukkaala T; Luoto R; Tuimala R
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 16856819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quantitative CTG appraisal sub partu with a new CTG score: diagnostic significance of the parameters of the acid-base balance in umbilical blood?].
    Roemer VM
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2003; 207(4):121-6. PubMed ID: 14528413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Machine learning ensemble modelling to classify caesarean section and vaginal delivery types using Cardiotocography traces.
    Fergus P; Selvaraj M; Chalmers C
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Feb; 93():7-16. PubMed ID: 29248699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
    Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.