150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25895440)
1. Comparison of pathological data between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen in patients with low to very low risk prostate cancer.
Lendínez-Cano G; Alonso-Flores J; Beltrán-Aguilar V; Cayuela A; Salazar-Otero S; Bachiller-Burgos J
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Oct; 39(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 25895440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors for clinically relevant Gleason score upgrade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Thomas C; Pfirrmann K; Pieles F; Bogumil A; Gillitzer R; Wiesner C; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 21592293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Mansouri N; Msakni I; Gargouri F; Khiari R; Bouziani A; Laabidi B
Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):430-436. PubMed ID: 30430487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumour growth fraction measured by immunohistochemical staining of Ki67 is an independent prognostic factor in preoperative prostate biopsies with small-volume or low-grade prostate cancer.
Zellweger T; Günther S; Zlobec I; Savic S; Sauter G; Moch H; Mattarelli G; Eichenberger T; Curschellas E; Rüfenacht H; Bachmann A; Gasser TC; Mihatsch MJ; Bubendorf L
Int J Cancer; 2009 May; 124(9):2116-23. PubMed ID: 19117060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?
Chen DJ; Falzarano SM; McKenney JK; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP; Roma A; Jones JS; Stephenson A; Klein E; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2015 Aug; 116(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 25060664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and pathological parameters predicting extracapsular disease in patients undergoing a radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Sfoungaristos S; Perimenis P
Prague Med Rep; 2012; 113(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 22373800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading.
Donohue JF; Bianco FJ; Kuroiwa K; Vickers AJ; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT; Reuter VA; Eastham JA
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):991-5. PubMed ID: 16890678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minute focus of prostate cancer on needle biopsy: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen.
Montanari E; Del Nero A; Gazzano G; Mangiarotti B; Bernardini P; Longo F; Cordima G; Itri E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2009 Mar; 81(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19499751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is seminal vesicle ablation mandatory for all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis on 1283 patients.
Zlotta AR; Roumeguère T; Ravery V; Hoffmann P; Montorsi F; Türkeri L; Dobrovrits M; Scattoni V; Ekane S; Bollens R; Vanden Bossche M; Djavan B; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC;
Eur Urol; 2004 Jul; 46(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 15183546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance.
Norman Z; Militza P; Andres F; Daniela F; Alejandro M; Catherine S; Juan F
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24856482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A solitary positive prostate cancer biopsy does not predict a unilateral lesion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Yoneyama T; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
Scand J Urol; 2015 Apr; 49(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25165894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
