These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25896108)

  • 41. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.
    Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.
    Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multimodal Assessment of Corneal Thinning Using Optical Coherence Tomography, Scheimpflug Imaging, Pachymetry, and Slit-Lamp Examination.
    Oatts JT; Keenan JD; Mannis T; Lietman TM; Rose-Nussbaumer J
    Cornea; 2017 Apr; 36(4):425-430. PubMed ID: 28129300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects.
    Vollmer L; Sowka J; Pizzimenti J; Yu X
    Optometry; 2012 May; 83(5):167-72. PubMed ID: 23249119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
    Scotto R; Bagnis A; Papadia M; Cutolo CA; Risso D; Traverso CE
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Oct; 26(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 28834824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound.
    Lackner B; Schmidinger G; Pieh S; Funovics MA; Skorpik C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 82(10):892-9. PubMed ID: 16276321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Central corneal thickness measurement with a retinal optical coherence tomography device versus standard ultrasonic pachymetry.
    Bechmann M; Thiel MJ; Neubauer AS; Ullrich S; Ludwig K; Kenyon KR; Ulbig MW
    Cornea; 2001 Jan; 20(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 11189004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry.
    Al-Mezaine HS; Al-Amro SA; Kangave D; Sadaawy A; Wehaib TA; Al-Obeidan S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 28(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 17898935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness.
    Calvo-Sanz JA; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Sánchez-Tena MA
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 28254359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT.
    Kim JS; Rho CR; Cho YW; Shin J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(16):e25638. PubMed ID: 33879743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
    Şimşek C; Kaya C; Karalezli A
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 52(5):318-323. PubMed ID: 36317802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Corneal Power Measurement Obtained by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Comparison With Scheimpflug and Automated Keratometry Measurements.
    Wang Q; Hua Y; Savini G; Chen H; Bao F; Lin S; Lu W; Huang J
    Cornea; 2015 Oct; 34(10):1266-71. PubMed ID: 26226469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.
    Jahadi Hosseini HR; Katbab A; Khalili MR; Abtahi MB
    Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1091-5. PubMed ID: 20628301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Between Fourier-Domain OCT, Very High-Frequency Digital Ultrasound, and Scheimpflug Imaging Systems.
    Yap TE; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Reinstein DZ
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 32(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 26856428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 93(6):e488-94. PubMed ID: 25495530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparability and repeatability of pachymetry in keratoconus using four noncontact techniques.
    Kumar M; Shetty R; Jayadev C; Dutta D
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 63(9):722-7. PubMed ID: 26632128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vivo evaluation of the cornea and conjunctiva of the normal laboratory beagle using time- and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Strom AR; Cortés DE; Rasmussen CA; Thomasy SM; McIntyre K; Lee SF; Kass PH; Mannis MJ; Murphy CJ
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 19(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25676065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Factors affecting central corneal thickness measurement agreement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconus.
    Sorkin N; Ohri A; Jung H; Haines L; Sorbara L; Mimouni M; Singal N; Hatch W;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Oct; 105(10):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 32972916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement.
    Maloca PM; Studer HP; Ambrósio R; Goldblum D; Rothenbuehler S; Barthelmes D; Zweifel S; Scholl HPN; Balaskas K; Tufail A; Hasler PW
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203884. PubMed ID: 30212550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.