These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25896573)
1. Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis. Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Boland A; Dwan K; Beale S; Fleeman N; McEntee J; Dundar Y; Richardson M; Fisher M Health Technol Assess; 2015 Apr; 19(29):1-130. PubMed ID: 25896573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies. Harris J; Pouwels KB; Johnson T; Sterne J; Pithara C; Mahadevan K; Reeves B; Benedetto U; Loke Y; Lasserson D; Doble B; Hopewell-Kelly N; Redwood S; Wordsworth S; Mumford A; Rogers C; Pufulete M Health Technol Assess; 2023 May; 27(8):1-257. PubMed ID: 37435838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prasugrel for the treatment of acute coronary artery syndromes with percutaneous coronary intervention. Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Boland A; Saborido CM; Fleeman N; McLeod C; Dundar Y; Dickson R; Proudlove C; Kolamunnage-Dona R; Fisher M Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 20507801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prasugrel vs clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Turkey. Davies A; Bakhai A; Schmitt C; Barrett A; Graham-Clarke P; Sculpher M J Med Econ; 2013; 16(4):510-21. PubMed ID: 23339464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different treatment durations of clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and value of information analysis. Rogowski W; Burch J; Palmer S; Craigs C; Golder S; Woolacott N Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13(31):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-77. PubMed ID: 19573471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discharge aspirin dose and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: an analysis from the TRITON-TIMI 38 study (trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 38). Kohli P; Udell JA; Murphy SA; Cannon CP; Antman EM; Braunwald E; Wiviott SD J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 63(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 24140678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ticagrelor and Prasugrel for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Zhao YJ; Khoo AL; Lin L; Teng M; Wu TS; Chan MY; Lim BP Value Health Reg Issues; 2016 May; 9():22-27. PubMed ID: 27881255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical review of prasugrel for formulary decision makers. Schafer JA; Kjesbo NK; Gleason PP J Manag Care Pharm; 2009 May; 15(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19422273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. De Filippo O; Piroli F; Bruno F; Bocchino PP; Saglietto A; Franchin L; Angelini F; Gallone G; Rizzello G; Ahmad M; Gasparini M; Chatterjee S; De Ferrari GM; D'Ascenzo F BMJ Evid Based Med; 2024 May; 29(3):171-186. PubMed ID: 38242567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antiplatelet Therapy in ACS Patients: Comparing Appropriate P2Y12 Inhibition by Clopidogrel to the Use of New P2Y12 Inhibitors. Ristorto J; Messas N; Marchandot B; Kibler M; Hess S; Meyer N; Schaeffer M; Tuzin N; Ohlmann P; Jesel L; Morel O J Atheroscler Thromb; 2018 Aug; 25(8):674-689. PubMed ID: 29415954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clopidogrel used in combination with aspirin compared with aspirin alone in the treatment of non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Main C; Palmer S; Griffin S; Jones L; Orton V; Sculpher M; Henderson R; Sudlow C; Hawkins N; Riemsma R Health Technol Assess; 2004 Oct; 8(40):iii-iv, xv-xvi, 1-141. PubMed ID: 15461878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided and dual antiplatelet therapies in acute coronary syndrome. Kazi DS; Garber AM; Shah RU; Dudley RA; Mell MW; Rhee C; Moshkevich S; Boothroyd DB; Owens DK; Hlatky MA Ann Intern Med; 2014 Feb; 160(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 24727840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-Year Clinical Effectiveness Comparison of Prasugrel with Ticagrelor: Results from a Retrospective Observational Study using an Integrated Claims Database. Effron MB; Nair KV; Molife C; Keller SY; Page RL; Simeone JC; Murphy B; Nordstrom BL; Zhu Y; McCollam PL; Vetrovec GW Am J Cardiovasc Drugs; 2018 Apr; 18(2):129-141. PubMed ID: 29222628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rivaroxaban for Preventing Atherothrombotic Events in People with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Elevated Cardiac Biomarkers: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pandor A; Pollard D; Chico T; Henderson R; Stevenson M Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 May; 34(5):463-77. PubMed ID: 26689783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prasugrel or ticagrelor relative to clopidogrel in triple-antiplatelet treatment combined with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor for patients with STEMI undergoing PCI: a meta-analysis. Wang Z; Zhou DY; Su Y; Si LY; Xu Q BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Mar; 20(1):130. PubMed ID: 32164560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness of acute coronary syndrome secondary prevention with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel: economic evaluation from the public payer's perspective in Poland based on the PLATO trial results. Pawęska J; Macioch T; Perkowski P; Budaj A; Niewada M Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 24846362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutenaous coronary intervention: a Spanish model-based cost effectiveness analysis. Davies A; Sculpher M; Barrett A; Huete T; Sacristán JA; Dilla T Farm Hosp; 2013; 37(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 24010692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with or without angiography: a secondary, prespecified analysis of the TRILOGY ACS trial. Wiviott SD; White HD; Ohman EM; Fox KA; Armstrong PW; Prabhakaran D; Hafley G; Lokhnygina Y; Boden WE; Hamm C; Clemmensen P; Nicolau JC; Menozzi A; Ruzyllo W; Widimsky P; Oto A; Leiva-Pons J; Pavlides G; Winters KJ; Roe MT; Bhatt DL Lancet; 2013 Aug; 382(9892):605-13. PubMed ID: 23953385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and planned percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction TRITON-TIMI 38. Mahoney EM; Wang K; Arnold SV; Proskorovsky I; Wiviott S; Antman E; Braunwald E; Cohen DJ Circulation; 2010 Jan; 121(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 20026770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]