These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25896756)
1. Patient-centric HTA: different strokes for different folks. Mühlbacher AC Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 15(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 25896756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evolving role of patient preference studies in health-care decision-making, from clinical drug development to clinical care management. Jackson Y; Janssen E; Fischer R; Beaverson K; Loftus J; Betteridge K; Rhoten S; Flood E; Lundie M Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Aug; 19(4):383-396. PubMed ID: 31070048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PATIENT-CENTERED DECISION MAKING: LESSONS FROM MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR QUANTIFYING PATIENT PREFERENCES. Marsh K; Caro JJ; Zaiser E; Heywood J; Hamed A Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 29277175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear. Epstein RM; Gramling RE Med Care Res Rev; 2013 Feb; 70(1 Suppl):94S-112S. PubMed ID: 23035055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whose preferences should be elicited for use in health-care decision-making? A case study using anticoagulant therapy. Mott DJ; Najafzadeh M Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016; 16(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26560704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Making Good Decisions in Healthcare with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: The Use, Current Research and Future Development of MCDA. Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Feb; 14(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 26519081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study. Wortley S; Tong A; Lancsar E; Salkeld G; Howard K BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Jul; 15():52. PubMed ID: 26166149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health technology assessment and primary data collection for reducing uncertainty in decision making. Goeree R; Levin L; Chandra K; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Tarride JE; Burke N; Bischof M; Xie F; O'Reilly D J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):332-42. PubMed ID: 19394574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health Preference Research in Europe: A Review of Its Use in Marketing Authorization, Reimbursement, and Pricing Decisions-Report of the ISPOR Stated Preference Research Special Interest Group. Marsh K; van Til JA; Molsen-David E; Juhnke C; Hawken N; Oehrlein EM; Choi YC; Duenas A; Greiner W; Haas K; Hiligsmann M; Hockley KS; Ivlev I; Liu F; Ostermann J; Poder T; Poon JL; Muehlbacher A Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):831-841. PubMed ID: 32762984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence, values, and decision making. Rawlins MD Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Apr; 30(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 24774475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amplifying Each Patient's Voice: A Systematic Review of Multi-criteria Decision Analyses Involving Patients. Marsh K; Caro JJ; Hamed A; Zaiser E Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Apr; 15(2):155-162. PubMed ID: 27928659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-Focused Benefit-Risk Analysis to Inform Regulatory Decisions: The European Union Perspective. Mühlbacher AC; Juhnke C; Beyer AR; Garner S Value Health; 2016; 19(6):734-740. PubMed ID: 27712699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. INFLUENCE OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND ITS MEASUREMENT. Hailey D; Werkö S; Rosén M; Macpherson K; Myles S; Gallegos Rivero V; Hipólito-Olivares C; Sihvo S; Pwu J; Yang WW; Chen YC; Perez Galán A; Aleman A; Villamil E Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(6):376-384. PubMed ID: 28124969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revealing and acknowledging value judgments in health technology assessment. Hofmann B; Cleemput I; Bond K; Krones T; Droste S; Sacchini D; Oortwijn W Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Dec; 30(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 25816823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Is Next for Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment? A Systematic Review of the Challenges. Huls SPI; Whichello CL; van Exel J; Uyl-de Groot CA; de Bekker-Grob EW Value Health; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1318-1328. PubMed ID: 31708070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications. Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Sep; 9(5):331-47. PubMed ID: 21875163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria. Zechmeister I; Schumacher I Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 22233544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption. Poulin P; Austen L; Scott CM; Waddell CD; Dixon E; Poulin M; Lafrenière R J Health Organ Manag; 2013; 27(2):246-65. PubMed ID: 23802401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]