These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25896756)

  • 21. Overdue choices: how information and role in decision-making influence women's preferences for induction for prolonged pregnancy.
    Stevens G; Miller YD
    Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):248-57. PubMed ID: 23281907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Health technology assessment.
    Hailey D
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Defining products for a new health technology assessment agency in Madrid, Spain: a survey of decision makers.
    Andradas E; Blasco JA; Valentín B; López-Pedraza MJ; Gracia FJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 18218170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence-based decision-making 3: Health technology assessment.
    O'Reilly D; Campbell K; Vanstone M; Bowen JM; Schwartz L; Assasi N; Goeree R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():417-41. PubMed ID: 25694325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
    Bridges JF; Jones C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17234014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Health technology assessment.
    Papatheofanis FJ
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 10967621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing Health Technology Assessment to address health care system needs.
    Velasco Garrido M; Gerhardus A; Røttingen JA; Busse R
    Health Policy; 2010 Mar; 94(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19889471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Incorporating Quantitative Patient Preference Data into Healthcare Decision Making Processes: Is HTA Falling Behind?
    Mott DJ
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):249-252. PubMed ID: 29500706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment: Perspectives of Canadian, Belgian and German HTA Representatives.
    van Overbeeke E; Forrester V; Simoens S; Huys I
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):119-128. PubMed ID: 32856278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment in Canada: insights from an expert panel discussion.
    Diaby V; Goeree R; Hoch J; Siebert U
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Feb; 15(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25267699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and test of a decision support tool for hospital health technology assessment.
    Sampietro-Colom L; Morilla-Bachs I; Gutierrez-Moreno S; Gallo P
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Oct; 28(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 23062518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient centered decision making: use of conjoint analysis to determine risk-benefit trade-offs for preference sensitive treatment choices.
    Wilson L; Loucks A; Bui C; Gipson G; Zhong L; Schwartzburg A; Crabtree E; Goodin D; Waubant E; McCulloch C
    J Neurol Sci; 2014 Sep; 344(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 25037284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using health technology assessment to support evidence-based decision-making in Canada: an academic perspective.
    Xie F; Bowen JM; Sutherland SC; Burke N; Blackhouse G; Tarride JE; O'Reilly D; Goeree R
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Oct; 11(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 21958096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Application of HTA research on policy decision-making.
    Youngkong S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S119-26. PubMed ID: 24964709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Harnessing the Therapist Effect in Patient-Centered Mental Health Care Decision Making.
    Boswell JF; Constantino MJ; Kraus DR
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 2017 Sep; 44(5):724-728. PubMed ID: 28064399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient-Centered Research into Outcomes Stroke Patients Prefer and Effectiveness Research: Implementing the patient-driven research paradigm to aid decision making in stroke care.
    Xian Y; O'Brien EC; Fonarow GC; Olson DM; Schwamm LH; Hannah D; Lindholm B; Maisch L; Lytle BL; Greiner MA; Wu J; Peterson ED; Pencina MJ; Hernandez AF
    Am Heart J; 2015 Jul; 170(1):36-45, 45.e1-11. PubMed ID: 26093862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.
    Drummond MF; Schwartz JS; Jönsson B; Luce BR; Neumann PJ; Siebert U; Sullivan SD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. PubMed ID: 18601792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An overview of critical decision-points in the medical product lifecycle: Where to include patient preference information in the decision-making process?
    Whichello C; Bywall KS; Mauer J; Stephen W; Cleemput I; Pinto CA; van Overbeeke E; Huys I; de Bekker-Grob EW; Hermann R; Veldwijk J
    Health Policy; 2020 Dec; 124(12):1325-1332. PubMed ID: 32839011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health technology assessment in India: the potential for improved healthcare decision-making.
    Kumar M; Ebrahim S; Taylor FC; Chokshi M; Gabbay J
    Natl Med J India; 2014; 27(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 25668089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does conditional approval for new oncology drugs in Europe lead to differences in health technology assessment decisions?
    Lipska I; Hoekman J; McAuslane N; Leufkens HG; Hövels AM
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2015 Nov; 98(5):489-91. PubMed ID: 26250656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.