These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25896756)

  • 41. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.
    Facey K; Boivin A; Gracia J; Hansen HP; Lo Scalzo A; Mossman J; Single A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jul; 26(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 20584364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences.
    Danner M; Hummel JM; Volz F; van Manen JG; Wiegard B; Dintsios CM; Bastian H; Gerber A; Ijzerman MJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 22004779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Power relations and contrasting conceptions of evidence in patient-involvement processes used to inform health funding decisions in Australia.
    Lopes E; Carter D; Street J
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 135():84-91. PubMed ID: 25950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Social and ethical analysis in health technology assessment.
    Tantivess S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S81-6. PubMed ID: 24964703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. DECISION-MAKING ALIGNED WITH RAPID-CYCLE EVALUATION IN HEALTH CARE.
    Schneeweiss S; Shrank WH; Ruhl M; Maclure M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 26585440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?
    Ciani O; Tarricone R; Torbica A
    Health Policy; 2012 Dec; 108(2-3):194-202. PubMed ID: 23093020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patients Should Define Value in Health Care: A Conceptual Framework.
    Kamal RN; Lindsay SE; Eppler SL
    J Hand Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 43(11):1030-1034. PubMed ID: 29754755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.
    Siebert M; Clauss LC; Carlisle M; Casteels B; de Jong P; Kreuzer M; Sanghera S; Stokoe G; Trueman P; Lang AW;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 12391964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].
    Mittermayer R; Huić M; Mestrović J
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 21692267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Decision-Oriented Health Technology Assessment: One Step Forward in Supporting the Decision-Making Process in Hospitals.
    Ritrovato M; Faggiano FC; Tedesco G; Derrico P
    Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 26091605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using health technology assessment for informing coverage decisions in Thailand.
    Mohara A; Youngkong S; Velasco RP; Werayingyong P; Pachanee K; Prakongsai P; Tantivess S; Tangcharoensathien V; Lertiendumrong J; Jongudomsuk P; Teerawattananon Y
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Mar; 1(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 24237374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Shared decision-making and decision support: their role in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Tucker Edmonds B
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 26(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 25319001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Identification and review of cost-effectiveness model parameters: a qualitative study.
    Kaltenthaler E; Essat M; Tappenden P; Paisley S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Jul; 30(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 25089856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems.
    Allen N; Pichler F; Wang T; Patel S; Salek S
    Health Policy; 2013 Dec; 113(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 24176288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [How can the impact of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the Austrian healthcare system be assessed? Design of a conceptual framework].
    Schumacher I; Zechmeister I
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Apr; 74(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 21267815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Value-Based Assessment of New Medical Technologies: Towards a Robust Methodological Framework for the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in the Context of Health Technology Assessment.
    Angelis A; Kanavos P
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 May; 34(5):435-46. PubMed ID: 26739955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Innovation in health care: the role of HTA in the introduction of new technologies].
    Bührlen B
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2010; 104(10):703-8. PubMed ID: 21147431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The use of research evidence on patient preferences in health care decision-making: issues, controversies and moving forward.
    Dirksen CD
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Dec; 14(6):785-94. PubMed ID: 25135194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Information analytics for healthcare service discovery.
    Sun L; Yamin M; Mushi C; Liu K; Alsaigh M; Chen F
    J Healthc Eng; 2014; 5(4):457-77. PubMed ID: 25516128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing the impact of health technology assessment on the Austrian healthcare system.
    Schumacher I; Zechmeister I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Jan; 29(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 23228411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.