101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2589796)
1. [Durability of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis in aortic or mitral positions. 10 years' results on 458 surgically treated cases].
Soots G; Stankowiak C; Warembourg H; Pol A; Watel A; Prat A; Devulder JP; Dufay C; Moreau D; Noblet D
Ann Chir; 1989; 43(8):616-23. PubMed ID: 2589796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve in the supra annular aortic position. Results after 12 years in a series of 1108 patients].
Logeais Y; Leguerrier A; Rioux C; Chaperon J; Lelong B; Langanay T; Delambre JF; el Issa A; Valla J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1997 Jun; 90(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 9295930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: mid-term clinical results.
Meyns B; Szecsi J; Flameng W; Daenen W
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 8162219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Influence of the valve position on the complications related to pericardial Carpentier-Edwards valve after 8 years].
Aupart M; Dreyfus X; Meurisse Y; May MA; Sirinelli A; Marchand M
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1995 Jul; 88(7):967-71. PubMed ID: 7487327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Twelve-year experience with Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve in the mitral position: a multicenter study.
Marchand M; Aupart M; Norton R; Goldsmith IR; Pelletier C; Pellerin M; Dubiel T; Daenen W; Casselman F; Holden M; David TE; Ryba EA
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 9651842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Aortic valve replacement with pericardial bioprosthesis in patients under 60 years of age. Experience over 10 years].
Aupart M; Hammami S; Sirinelli A; Dreyfus X; Meurisse Y; Marchand M
Ann Chir; 1996; 50(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 8761106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
Jamieson WR; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Lichtenstein SV; Fradet GJ; Janusz MT
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis. A new generation tissue valve with excellent intermediate clinical performance.
Jamieson WR; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Gerein AN; Janusz MT; Tyers GF; Allen P
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Oct; 96(4):652-66. PubMed ID: 3172812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Four- to seven-year follow-up of patients undergoing Carpentier-Edwards porcine heart valve replacement.
Gallo I; Artiñano E; Nistal F
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Dec; 33(6):347-51. PubMed ID: 2417370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
