482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25898958)
21. A comparative analysis of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent
Wagle PB; Jambhekar NA; Kumar R; Prabhash K; Pramesh CS; Desai SB; Noronha V; Karimundackal G; Shah A; Joshi A; Laskar SG; Jiwnani S; Pai T; Agarwal JP
Indian J Cancer; 2017; 54(1):148-154. PubMed ID: 29199679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ALK immunohistochemistry positive, FISH negative NSCLC is infrequent, but associated with impaired survival following treatment with crizotinib.
Thunnissen E; Lissenberg-Witte BI; van den Heuvel MM; Monkhorst K; Skov BG; Sørensen JB; Mellemgaard A; Dingemans AMC; Speel EJM; de Langen AJ; Hashemi SMS; Bahce I; van der Drift MA; Looijen-Salamon MG; Gosney J; Postmus PE; Samii SMS; Duplaquet F; Weynand B; Durando X; Penault-Llorca F; Finn S; Grady AO; Oz B; Akyurek N; Buettner R; Wolf J; Bubendorf L; Duin S; Marondel I; Heukamp LC; Timens W; Schuuring EMD; Pauwels P; Smit EF
Lung Cancer; 2019 Dec; 138():13-18. PubMed ID: 31630043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Gene Re-Arrangement in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma in the Indian Population: Comparison of Techniques and Immunohistochemistry Clones.
Shukla S; Pandey RK; Kant S; Garg R; Anand N; Kushwaha R; Malhotra KP; Srivastava A; Bhatt M; Husain N
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2019; 35(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 30596395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of ALK rearrangement by immunohistochemistry in lung adenocarcinoma and the identification of a novel EML4-ALK variant.
To KF; Tong JH; Yeung KS; Lung RW; Law PP; Chau SL; Kang W; Tong CY; Chow C; Chan AW; Leung LK; Mok TS
J Thorac Oncol; 2013 Jul; 8(7):883-91. PubMed ID: 23625156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Immunohistochemistry-Negative but Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Is Resistant to Crizotinib.
Shi R; Varella-Garcia M; Li M; Ludkovski O; Danesh A; Ng C; Pham NA; Pugh T; Shepherd FA; Tsao MS
J Thorac Oncol; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2248-2252. PubMed ID: 27613526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of EML4-ALK rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer in Argentina.
Verzura M; Batagelj E; Bagnes C; Martin C; Enrico D; Richardet E; De la Iglesia P
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2018 Jun; 34():77-81. PubMed ID: 29661733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of immunohistochemical analysis in the evaluation of EML4-ALK gene rearrangement in lung cancer.
Sullivan HC; Fisher KE; Hoffa AL; Wang J; Saxe D; Siddiqui MT; Cohen C
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2015 Apr; 23(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 25265433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cytology specimens offer an effective alternative to formalin-fixed tissue as demonstrated by novel automated detection for ALK break-apart FISH testing and immunohistochemistry in lung adenocarcinoma.
Rosenblum F; Hutchinson LM; Garver J; Woda B; Cosar E; Kurian EM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Nov; 122(11):810-21. PubMed ID: 25099128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of IHC, FISH and RT-PCR methods for detection of ALK rearrangements in 312 non-small cell lung cancer patients in Taiwan.
Wu YC; Chang IC; Wang CL; Chen TD; Chen YT; Liu HP; Chu Y; Chiu YT; Wu TH; Chou LH; Chen YR; Huang SF
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e70839. PubMed ID: 23951022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Antibody 1A4 with routine immunohistochemistry demonstrates high sensitivity for ALK rearrangement screening of Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients: A single-center large-scale study.
Wang Q; Zhao L; Yang X; Wei S; Zeng Y; Mao C; Lin L; Fu P; Lyu L; Li Z; Xiao H
Lung Cancer; 2016 May; 95():39-43. PubMed ID: 27040850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Attenuated isolated 3' signal: A highly challenging therapy relevant ALK FISH pattern in NSCLC.
Smuk G; Pajor G; Szuhai K; Morreau H; Kocsmár I; Kocsmár É; Pajor L; Kajtár B; Sárosi V; Lotz G; Tornóczky T
Lung Cancer; 2020 May; 143():80-85. PubMed ID: 32272316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. French multicentric validation of ALK rearrangement diagnostic in 547 lung adenocarcinomas.
Lantuejoul S; Rouquette I; Blons H; Le Stang N; Ilie M; Begueret H; Grégoire V; Hofman P; Gros A; Garcia S; Monhoven N; Devouassoux-Shisheboran M; Mansuet-Lupo A; Thivolet F; Antoine M; Vignaud JM; Penault-Llorca F; Galateau-Sallé F; McLeer-Florin A
Eur Respir J; 2015 Jul; 46(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 25929957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accurate identification of ALK positive lung carcinoma patients: novel FDA-cleared automated fluorescence in situ hybridization scanning system and ultrasensitive immunohistochemistry.
Conde E; Suárez-Gauthier A; Benito A; Garrido P; García-Campelo R; Biscuola M; Paz-Ares L; Hardisson D; de Castro J; Camacho MC; Rodriguez-Abreu D; Abdulkader I; Ramirez J; Reguart N; Salido M; Pijuán L; Arriola E; Sanz J; Folgueras V; Villanueva N; Gómez-Román J; Hidalgo M; López-Ríos F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107200. PubMed ID: 25248157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. FISH patterns of ROS1, MET, and ALK with a correlation of ALK immunohistochemistry in lung cancer: a case for introducing ALK immunohistochemistry 'Equivocal' interpretation category in the Ventana anti-ALK (D5F3) CDx assay - A tertiary cancer center experience.
Singh A; Kumar R; Shetty O; Desai S; Rane S
Indian J Cancer; 2022; 59(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 33402590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ALK immunohistochemistry for ALK gene rearrangement screening in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pyo JS; Kang G; Sohn JH
Int J Biol Markers; 2016 Dec; 31(4):e413-e421. PubMed ID: 27338643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization methodologies for detection of echinoderm microtubule-associated proteinlike 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma: implications for optimal clinical testing.
Wallander ML; Geiersbach KB; Tripp SR; Layfield LJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jul; 136(7):796-803. PubMed ID: 22742552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Equivocal ALK fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) cases may benefit from ancillary ALK FISH probe testing.
Selinger C; Cooper W; Lum T; McNeil C; Morey A; Waring P; Amanuel B; Millward M; Peverall J; Van Vliet C; Christie M; Tran Y; Diakos C; Pavlakis N; Gill AJ; O'Toole S
Histopathology; 2015 Nov; 67(5):654-63. PubMed ID: 25847523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ALK+ lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers and long-term ex-smokers: prevalence and detection by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Williams AS; Greer W; Bethune D; Craddock KJ; Flowerdew G; Xu Z
Virchows Arch; 2016 Nov; 469(5):533-540. PubMed ID: 27562706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic value of a novel fully automated immunochemistry assay for detection of ALK rearrangement in primary lung adenocarcinoma.
Ying J; Guo L; Qiu T; Shan L; Ling Y; Liu X; Lu N
Ann Oncol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):2589-2593. PubMed ID: 23904459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Responses to crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma who tested immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-negative.
Ma D; Wang Z; Yang L; Mu X; Wang Y; Zhao X; Li J; Lin D
Oncotarget; 2016 Sep; 7(39):64410-64420. PubMed ID: 27418132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
