196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25899341)
1. Differences in skeletal components of temporomandibular joint of an early medieval and contemporary Croatian population obtained by different methods.
Kranjcic J; Slaus M; Persic S; Vodanovic M; Vojvodic D
Ann Anat; 2016 Jan; 203():52-8. PubMed ID: 25899341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in articular-eminence inclination between medieval and contemporary human populations.
Kranjčić J; Vojvodić D; Žabarović D; Vodanović M; Komar D; Mehulić K
Arch Oral Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(8):1147-52. PubMed ID: 22721644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Articular Eminence Inclination in Medieval and Contemporary Croatian Population.
Kranjčić J; Šlaus M; Vodanović M; Peršić S; Vojvodić D
Acta Clin Croat; 2016 Dec; 55(4):529-534. PubMed ID: 29116716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Condylar guidance: correlation between articular morphology and panoramic radiographic images in dry human skulls.
Gilboa I; Cardash HS; Kaffe I; Gross MD
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 18514670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusions.
Katsavrias EG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 16627172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Panoramic imaging of the temporomandibular joint: an experimental study using cadaveric skulls.
Fallon SD; Fritz GW; Laskin DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 16413893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between the morphology and thickness of bony components of the temporomandibular joint and gender, age and remaining teeth on cone-beam CT images.
Razi T; Razi S
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 30328308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of horizontal condylar angle and x-ray projection angle on the appearance of the condyle on lateral temporomandibular joint panoramic radiographs.
Beloor Vasudeva S; Kameko N; Endo A; Okano T
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Dec; 11(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 23208594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intercondylar distances of the human temporomandibular joints.
Lazić B; Tepavcević B; Keros J; Komar D; Stanicić T; Azinović Z
Coll Antropol; 2006 Mar; 30(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 16617573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is orthopantomography reliable for TMJ diagnosis? An experimental study on a dry skull.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
J Orofac Pain; 1995; 9(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 8995908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic morphology of the temporomandibular joint related to occlusal characteristics.
Matsumoto MA; Bolognese AM
Braz Dent J; 1994; 5(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8974543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three radiographic methods for detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes: panoramic, scanographic and tomographic examination.
Hintze H; Wiese M; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Mar; 38(3):134-40. PubMed ID: 19225083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between patient characteristics, mandibular head morphology and thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa in symptomatic temporomandibular joints.
Kijima N; Honda K; Kuroki Y; Sakabe J; Ejima K; Nakajima I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 17586854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and radiographic findings of the temporomandibular joint in patients with various rheumatic diseases. A case-control study.
Helenius LM; Hallikainen D; Helenius I; Meurman JH; Könönen M; Leirisalo-Repo M; Lindqvist C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 15772594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Anatomical Changes of Temporomandibular Joint Use of Pre-post Dentures: A Time-control Study.
Singh PK; Raman N; Singh VK; Akhtar S; Mishra P; Sharma S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1354-1360. PubMed ID: 33893258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relation of the glenoid fossa to craniofacial morphology, studied on dry human skulls.
Pirttiniemi P; Kantomaa T; Rönning O
Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 2288207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Condylar shape analysis using panoramic radiography units and conventional tomography.
Mawani F; Lam EW; Heo G; McKee I; Raboud DW; Major PW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 15716843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [3D analysis of anatomical and functional parameters of TMJ and their correlation].
Ryakhovsky AN; Losev FF; Altynbekov KD; Vykhodtseva MA
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2022; 101(3):49-60. PubMed ID: 35640180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new approach to improve TMJ morphological information from plain film radiographs.
Dias GJ; Premachandra IM; Mahoney PM; Kieser JA
Cranio; 2005 Jan; 23(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 15727319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. retrospective evaluation of condylar morphology using panoramic radiography in a sample of Turkish population.
Peker Öztürk H; Avsever İsmail H; Şenel B; Özgedik HS; Kurt MH
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2024; 83(1):192-199. PubMed ID: 37345390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
