257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25899637)
1. Optical power distribution of refractive and aspheric multifocal contact lenses: Effect of pupil size.
Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 25899637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro power profiles of multifocal simultaneous vision contact lenses.
Montés-Micó R; Madrid-Costa D; Domínguez-Vicent A; Belda-Salmerón L; Ferrer-Blasco T
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 24156956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Power profiles of multifocal contact lenses and their interpretation.
Plainis S; Atchison DA; Charman WN
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 90(10):1066-77. PubMed ID: 23995515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
Legras R; Rio D
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of power profiles measured on NIMO TR1504 (Lambda-X) and effects of lens decentration for single vision, bifocal and multifocal contact lenses.
Kim E; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K
J Optom; 2016; 9(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 26590009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Power profiles in multifocal contact lenses with variable multifocal zone.
Monsálvez-Romín D; Domínguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Cerviño A
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jan; 101(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 28718954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power Profiles of Commercial Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses.
Kim E; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):183-196. PubMed ID: 27748699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral refraction and spherical aberration profiles with single vision, bifocal and multifocal soft contact lenses.
Fedtke C; Ehrmann K; Bakaraju RC
J Optom; 2020; 13(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 30772211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective assessment of the effect of pupil size upon the power distribution of multifocal contact lenses.
Papadatou E; Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Madrid-Costa D; Cerviño-Expósito A
Int J Ophthalmol; 2017; 10(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 28149785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of in vitro power profile measurements for multifocal contact lenses.
Domínguez-Vicent A; Marín-Franch I; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Madrid-Costa D; Montés-Micó R
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Jun; 38(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 25704460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro power profiles of daily disposable contact lenses.
Belda-Salmerón L; Madrid-Costa D; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):247-52. PubMed ID: 23639863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optical performance of multifocal soft contact lenses via a single-pass method.
Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Falk D; Ho A; Papas E
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):1107-18. PubMed ID: 22820470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of high-order optical aberrations induced by different multifocal contact lens geometries].
Peyre C; Fumery L; Gatinel D
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16141922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in accommodative responses with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Radhakrishnan H; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Nov; 88(11):1309-16. PubMed ID: 21926653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.
Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Ho A
J Optom; 2018; 11(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28606456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical quality of rotationally symmetrical contact lenses derived from their power profiles.
Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Monsálvez-Romín D; Papadatou E
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):346-350. PubMed ID: 28522252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction.
Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 27237964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
