These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25900021)

  • 1. Robotic and clinical evaluation of upper limb motor performance in patients with Friedreich's Ataxia: an observational study.
    Germanotta M; Vasco G; Petrarca M; Rossi S; Carniel S; Bertini E; Cappa P; Castelli E
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 12():41. PubMed ID: 25900021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing an objective evaluating system to quantify the degree of upper limb movement impairment in patients with severe Friedreich's ataxia.
    Arcuria G; Marcotulli C; Amuso R; Dattilo G; Galasso C; Pierelli F; Casali C
    Neurol Sci; 2020 Jun; 41(6):1577-1587. PubMed ID: 31993871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.
    Germanotta M; Cruciani A; Pecchioli C; Loreti S; Spedicato A; Meotti M; Mosca R; Speranza G; Cecchi F; Giannarelli G; Padua L; Aprile I
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 May; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 29769127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional and Gait Assessment in Children and Adolescents Affected by Friedreich's Ataxia: A One-Year Longitudinal Study.
    Vasco G; Gazzellini S; Petrarca M; Lispi ML; Pisano A; Zazza M; Della Bella G; Castelli E; Bertini E
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162463. PubMed ID: 27598307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of a Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Friedreich's ataxia patients according to posturography is limited.
    Schwabova J; Maly T; Laczo J; Zumrova A; Komarek V; Musova Z; Zahalka F
    J Neurol Sci; 2014 Jun; 341(1-2):64-7. PubMed ID: 24768059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measures of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients.
    Otaka E; Otaka Y; Kasuga S; Nishimoto A; Yamazaki K; Kawakami M; Ushiba J; Liu M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 12():66. PubMed ID: 26265327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of upper limb function in young Friedreich ataxia patients compared to control subjects using a new three-dimensional kinematic protocol.
    Maurel N; Diop A; Gouelle A; Alberti C; Husson I
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 23538127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Progression characteristics of the European Friedreich's Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies (EFACTS): a 2 year cohort study.
    Reetz K; Dogan I; Hilgers RD; Giunti P; Mariotti C; Durr A; Boesch S; Klopstock T; de Rivera FJR; Schöls L; Klockgether T; Bürk K; Rai M; Pandolfo M; Schulz JB;
    Lancet Neurol; 2016 Dec; 15(13):1346-1354. PubMed ID: 27839651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological and clinical characteristics of the European Friedreich's Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies (EFACTS) cohort: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data.
    Reetz K; Dogan I; Costa AS; Dafotakis M; Fedosov K; Giunti P; Parkinson MH; Sweeney MG; Mariotti C; Panzeri M; Nanetti L; Arpa J; Sanz-Gallego I; Durr A; Charles P; Boesch S; Nachbauer W; Klopstock T; Karin I; Depondt C; vom Hagen JM; Schöls L; Giordano IA; Klockgether T; Bürk K; Pandolfo M; Schulz JB
    Lancet Neurol; 2015 Feb; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 25566998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three clinical rating scales in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA).
    Bürk K; Mälzig U; Wolf S; Heck S; Dimitriadis K; Schmitz-Hübsch T; Hering S; Lindig TM; Haug V; Timmann D; Degen I; Kruse B; Dörr JM; Ratzka S; Ivo A; Schöls L; Boesch S; Klockgether T; Klopstock T; Schulz JB
    Mov Disord; 2009 Sep; 24(12):1779-84. PubMed ID: 19562766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upper limb evaluation with robotic exoskeleton. Normative values for indices of accuracy, speed and smoothness.
    Merlo A; Longhi M; Giannotti E; Prati P; Giacobbi M; Ruscelli E; Mancini A; Ottaviani M; Montanari L; Mazzoli D
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 24037096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated functional upper limb evaluation of patients with Friedreich ataxia using serious games rehabilitation exercises.
    Bonnechère B; Jansen B; Haack I; Omelina L; Feipel V; Van Sint Jan S; Pandolfo M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 15(1):87. PubMed ID: 30286776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Friedreich and dominant ataxias: quantitative differences in cerebellar dysfunction measurements.
    Tanguy Melac A; Mariotti C; Filipovic Pierucci A; Giunti P; Arpa J; Boesch S; Klopstock T; Müller Vom Hagen J; Klockgether T; Bürk K; Schulz JB; Reetz K; Pandolfo M; Durr A; Tezenas du Montcel S;
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 89(6):559-565. PubMed ID: 29279305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A robotic device as a sensitive quantitative tool to assess upper limb impairments in stroke patients: a preliminary prospective cohort study.
    Gilliaux M; Lejeune T; Detrembleur C; Sapin J; Dehez B; Stoquart G
    J Rehabil Med; 2012 Mar; 44(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22367455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery.
    Colombo R; Cusmano I; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1020-9. PubMed ID: 24760936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing an Instrumented Measure of Upper Limb Function in Friedreich Ataxia.
    Corben LA; Nguyen KD; Pathirana PN; Horne MK; Szmulewicz DJ; Roberts M; Delatycki MB
    Cerebellum; 2021 Jun; 20(3):430-438. PubMed ID: 33400236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Instrumental indices for upper limb function assessment in stroke patients: a validation study.
    Longhi M; Merlo A; Prati P; Giacobbi M; Mazzoli D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Jun; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 27278277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of upper extremity function using kinematic analysis.
    Ramos E; Latash MP; Hurvitz EA; Brown SH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 May; 78(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 9161367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinematic measures for upper limb motor assessment during robot-mediated training in patients with severe sub-acute stroke.
    Duret C; Courtial O; Grosmaire AG
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016; 34(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 26890098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
    Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.