409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25900454)
1. Exploring the sheep rumen microbiome for carbohydrate-active enzymes.
Lopes LD; de Souza Lima AO; Taketani RG; Darias P; da Silva LR; Romagnoli EM; Louvandini H; Abdalla AL; Mendes R
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2015 Jul; 108(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 25900454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle.
Li F; Guan LL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 May; 83(9):. PubMed ID: 28235871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding the alteration in rumen microbiome and CAZymes profile with diet and host through comparative metagenomic approach.
Bohra V; Dafale NA; Purohit HJ
Arch Microbiol; 2019 Dec; 201(10):1385-1397. PubMed ID: 31338542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbial and Carbohydrate Active Enzyme profile of buffalo rumen metagenome and their alteration in response to variation in the diet.
Patel DD; Patel AK; Parmar NR; Shah TM; Patel JB; Pandya PR; Joshi CG
Gene; 2014 Jul; 545(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 24797613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bacterial community in the rumen of Tibetan sheep and Gansu alpine fine-wool sheep grazing on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.
Huang J; Li Y; Luo Y
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2017 May; 63(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 28239039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metagenomic insights into the diversity of carbohydrate-degrading enzymes in the yak fecal microbial community.
Gong G; Zhou S; Luo R; Gesang Z; Suolang S
BMC Microbiol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):302. PubMed ID: 33036549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rumen metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of low methane yield sheep reveals a Sharpea-enriched microbiome characterised by lactic acid formation and utilisation.
Kamke J; Kittelmann S; Soni P; Li Y; Tavendale M; Ganesh S; Janssen PH; Shi W; Froula J; Rubin EM; Attwood GT
Microbiome; 2016 Oct; 4(1):56. PubMed ID: 27760570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes to the rumen bacterial population of sheep with the addition of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene to their diet.
Perumbakkam S; Mitchell EA; Craig AM
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2011 Feb; 99(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 20607404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metagenomic insights into the RDX-degrading potential of the ovine rumen microbiome.
Li RW; Giarrizzo JG; Wu S; Li W; Duringer JM; Craig AM
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110505. PubMed ID: 25383623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anaerobic transformation of octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) by ovine rumen microorganisms.
Perumbakkam S; Craig AM
Res Microbiol; 2012; 163(8):567-75. PubMed ID: 22903090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In depth analysis of rumen microbial and carbohydrate-active enzymes profile in Indian crossbred cattle.
Jose VL; More RP; Appoothy T; Arun AS
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 40(3):160-170. PubMed ID: 28284522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in methane emission, rumen fermentation, and methanogenic community in response to silage and dry cornstalk diets.
Chong L; Zhuping Z; Tongjun G; Yongming L; Hongmin D
J Basic Microbiol; 2014 Jun; 54(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 23696266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of the rumen microbiome of Indian Kankrej cattle (Bos indicus) adapted to different forage diet.
Patel V; Patel AK; Parmar NR; Patel AB; Reddy B; Joshi CG
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Dec; 98(23):9749-61. PubMed ID: 25359471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-depth diversity analysis of the bacterial community resident in the camel rumen.
Gharechahi J; Zahiri HS; Noghabi KA; Salekdeh GH
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 38(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 25467553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Propionibacterium acidipropionici P169 on the rumen and faecal microbiota of beef cattle fed a maize-based finishing diet.
Azad E; Narvaez N; Derakhshani H; Allazeh AY; Wang Y; McAllister TA; Khafipour E
Benef Microbes; 2017 Oct; 8(5):785-799. PubMed ID: 28856906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bacterial diversity associated with feeding dry forage at different dietary concentrations in the rumen contents of Mehshana buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) using 16S pyrotags.
Pitta DW; Kumar S; Veiccharelli B; Parmar N; Reddy B; Joshi CG
Anaerobe; 2014 Feb; 25():31-41. PubMed ID: 24315806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular diversity of rumen bacterial communities from tannin-rich and fiber-rich forage fed domestic Sika deer (Cervus nippon) in China.
Li ZP; Liu HL; Li GY; Bao K; Wang KY; Xu C; Yang YF; Yang FH; Wright AD
BMC Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 13():151. PubMed ID: 23834656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the culturability of the rumen bacterial microbiome.
Creevey CJ; Kelly WJ; Henderson G; Leahy SC
Microb Biotechnol; 2014 Sep; 7(5):467-79. PubMed ID: 24986151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene and transcript abundances of bacterial type III secretion systems from the rumen microbiome are correlated with methane yield in sheep.
Kamke J; Soni P; Li Y; Ganesh S; Kelly WJ; Leahy SC; Shi W; Froula J; Rubin EM; Attwood GT
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Aug; 10(1):367. PubMed ID: 28789673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation.
Xu B; Xu W; Li J; Dai L; Xiong C; Tang X; Yang Y; Mu Y; Zhou J; Ding J; Wu Q; Huang Z
BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):174. PubMed ID: 25887697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]