These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25900849)

  • 21. Autodock Vina Adopts More Accurate Binding Poses but Autodock4 Forms Better Binding Affinity.
    Nguyen NT; Nguyen TH; Pham TNH; Huy NT; Bay MV; Pham MQ; Nam PC; Vu VV; Ngo ST
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jan; 60(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 31887035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the binding performance of flavonoids to estrogen receptor alpha by Autodock, Autodock Vina and Surflex-Dock.
    Xue Q; Liu X; Russell P; Li J; Pan W; Fu J; Zhang A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Mar; 233():113323. PubMed ID: 35183811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock DSS.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2149-59. PubMed ID: 21541955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using parallelized incremental meta-docking can solve the conformational sampling issue when docking large ligands to proteins.
    Devaurs D; Antunes DA; Hall-Swan S; Mitchell N; Moll M; Lizée G; Kavraki LE
    BMC Mol Cell Biol; 2019 Sep; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 31488048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings.
    Eberhardt J; Santos-Martins D; Tillack AF; Forli S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Aug; 61(8):3891-3898. PubMed ID: 34278794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accelerating AutoDock Vina with GPUs.
    Tang S; Chen R; Lin M; Lin Q; Zhu Y; Ding J; Hu H; Ling M; Wu J
    Molecules; 2022 May; 27(9):. PubMed ID: 35566391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. AutoDock VinaXB: implementation of XBSF, new empirical halogen bond scoring function, into AutoDock Vina.
    Koebel MR; Schmadeke G; Posner RG; Sirimulla S
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():27. PubMed ID: 27195023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. AutoDock CrankPep: combining folding and docking to predict protein-peptide complexes.
    Zhang Y; Sanner MF
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(24):5121-5127. PubMed ID: 31161213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective flexibility of side-chain residues improves VEGFR-2 docking score using AutoDock Vina.
    Abreu RM; Froufe HJ; Queiroz MJ; Ferreira IC
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2012 Apr; 79(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 22188672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Toward on-the-fly quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) docking: development and benchmark of a scoring function.
    Chaskar P; Zoete V; Röhrig UF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3137-52. PubMed ID: 25296988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. DockingApp: a user friendly interface for facilitated docking simulations with AutoDock Vina.
    Di Muzio E; Toti D; Polticelli F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Feb; 31(2):213-218. PubMed ID: 28063067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Information-driven modeling of protein-peptide complexes.
    Trellet M; Melquiond AS; Bonvin AM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1268():221-39. PubMed ID: 25555727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improved docking of polypeptides with Glide.
    Tubert-Brohman I; Sherman W; Repasky M; Beuming T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1689-99. PubMed ID: 23800267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation and optimization of virtual screening workflows with DEKOIS 2.0--a public library of challenging docking benchmark sets.
    Bauer MR; Ibrahim TM; Vogel SM; Boeckler FM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1447-62. PubMed ID: 23705874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. FIPSDock: a new molecular docking technique driven by fully informed swarm optimization algorithm.
    Liu Y; Zhao L; Li W; Zhao D; Song M; Yang Y
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Jan; 34(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22961860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Webina: an open-source library and web app that runs AutoDock Vina entirely in the web browser.
    Kochnev Y; Hellemann E; Cassidy KC; Durrant JD
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 36(16):4513-4515. PubMed ID: 32559277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The AutoDock suite at 30.
    Goodsell DS; Sanner MF; Olson AJ; Forli S
    Protein Sci; 2021 Jan; 30(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 32808340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. GalaxyPepDock: a protein-peptide docking tool based on interaction similarity and energy optimization.
    Lee H; Heo L; Lee MS; Seok C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jul; 43(W1):W431-5. PubMed ID: 25969449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Challenging Reverse Screening: A Benchmark Study for Comprehensive Evaluation.
    Li M; Hu J; Wang Y; Li Y; Zhang L; Liu Z
    Mol Inform; 2022 Apr; 41(4):e2100063. PubMed ID: 34787366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.