These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25901021)

  • 1. ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Evaluation of Two CE-Marked Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):934-5. PubMed ID: 25901021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent System Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Salzsieder E; Berg S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 10(1):238-9. PubMed ID: 26394775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked Glucometer System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Hehmke B; Berg S; Salzsieder E
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 May; 11(3):635-636. PubMed ID: 27707915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Rutschmann M; Haug C; Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.
    Freckmann G; Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):635-48. PubMed ID: 26110670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surveillance of the System Accuracy of Two Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose After Market Approval.
    Jeanny G; Hope P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 10(1):240-1. PubMed ID: 26424240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1060-75. PubMed ID: 23063032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring System Exceeds International Accuracy Standards.
    Brazg RL; Klaff LJ; Sussman AM
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1414-1415. PubMed ID: 27271844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control Solutions for Blood Glucose Meters: A Neglected Opportunity for Reliable Measurements?
    Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):723-4. PubMed ID: 26002834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood glucose meters.
    Wahowiak L
    Diabetes Forecast; 2014 Jan; 67(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 25868294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of System Accuracy of the GlucoMen LX Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System With Reference to ISO 15197:2013.
    Pfützner A; Demircik F; Ramljak S; Pfützner AH; Berti F; Scuffi C; Valglimigli F
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 10(2):618-9. PubMed ID: 26553022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
    Vanterpool GE
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):995-6. PubMed ID: 26892507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Mende J; Link M; Zschornack E; Haug C; Freckmann G
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31958308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concerns about glucose-meter study.
    Ellison J; Cariski AT; Price DA; Kelly KL
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Mar; 64(6):584, 586; author reply 586, 588. PubMed ID: 17353564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why the New FDA Glucose Meter POCT Guidance Is Disappointing.
    Krouwer JS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1274. PubMed ID: 27923882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 2008 resource guide. Blood glucose monitoring and data management systems. Before you buy a blood glucose monitor (also known as a blood glucose meter), check with your doctor and diabetes educator. Make sure the one you choose is well suited to your particular needs.
    Diabetes Forecast; 2008 Jan; 61(1):RG31-2, RG34-48. PubMed ID: 18290290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy Evaluation of Two Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Berti F; Scuffi C; Valgimigli F
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(6):1354-6. PubMed ID: 26224761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and precision assessment of a new blood glucose monitoring system.
    Ji LN; Guo LX; Liu LB
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 54(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 26053011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.
    Klonoff DC; Prahalad P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):895-910. PubMed ID: 25990294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.