These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25901717)

  • 1. Proposal for the modification of the conventional model for establishing performance specifications.
    Oosterhuis WP; Sandberg S
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):925-37. PubMed ID: 25901717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of analytical quality specifications based on biological within- and between-subject variation.
    Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Jørgensen L; Brandslund I; Stahl M; Gowans E; Libeer JC; Ricós C
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2002 Nov; 39(Pt 6):543-50. PubMed ID: 12564835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Domestic and international trends concerning allowable limits of error in external quality assessment scheme].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 16026083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical quality specifications for common reference intervals.
    Ricós C; Doménech MV; Perich C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):858-62. PubMed ID: 15327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. General strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance characteristics.
    Fraser CG
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):487-90. PubMed ID: 10667685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analytical performance specifications for EQA schemes - need for harmonisation.
    Dallas Jones GR
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):919-24. PubMed ID: 25883203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA.
    Thelen MHM; Jansen RTP; Weykamp CW; Steigstra H; Meijer R; Cobbaert CM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 55(10):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 28182577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing the use of the "state-of-the-art" performance criteria.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Streichert T
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):887-91. PubMed ID: 25803083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can current analytical quality performance of UK clinical laboratories support evidence-based guidelines for diabetes and ischaemic heart disease?--A pilot study and a proposal.
    Jassam N; Yundt-Pacheco J; Jansen R; Thomas A; Barth JH
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 51(8):1579-84. PubMed ID: 23525878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma metrics quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680.
    Tran MT; Hoang K; Greaves RF
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 49(16-17):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 27527571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imprecision Investigation and Analysis of Routine Chemistry in China.
    Fei Y; Wang W; He F; Zhong K; Wang Z
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Sep; 30(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 26423825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ASVCP guidelines: allowable total error guidelines for biochemistry.
    Harr KE; Flatland B; Nabity M; Freeman KP;
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 42(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 24320779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Requirements for reproducibility, trueness and error of measurement in internal quality control schemes.
    Bonvicini P; Metus P; Pavón MA; Tocchini M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 May; 41(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 12812269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory precision performance: state of the art versus operating specifications that assure the analytical quality required by clinical laboratory improvement amendments proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Bawa N; Ross JW; Lawson NS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jul; 120(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 8757464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards more complete specifications for acceptable analytical performance - a plea for error grid analysis.
    Krouwer JS; Cembrowski GS
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 49(7):1127-30. PubMed ID: 21619465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28153359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance specifications for sodium should not be based on biological variation.
    Oosterhuis WP; Coskun A; Sandberg S; Theodorsson E
    Clin Chim Acta; 2023 Feb; 540():117221. PubMed ID: 36640931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should quality goals be defined for multicenter laboratory testing? Lessons learned from a pilot survey on a national surveillance program for diabetes.
    Wang L; Mo N; Pang R; Deng Q; Liu Y; Hu Y; Hu C; Wang L
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Apr; 28(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 26796487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.