These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25902142)

  • 1. The effect of implicitly incentivized faking on explicit and implicit measures of doping attitude: when athletes want to pretend an even more negative attitude to doping.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Brand R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0118507. PubMed ID: 25902142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Illegal performance enhancing drugs and doping in sport: a picture-based brief implicit association test for measuring athletes' attitudes.
    Brand R; Heck P; Ziegler M
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2014 Jan; 9():7. PubMed ID: 24479865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Englert C; Brand R; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 May; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27142046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes.
    Schindler S; Wolff W; Kissler JM; Brand R
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():139. PubMed ID: 26074798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes.
    Deng Z; Guo J; Wang D; Huang T; Chen Z
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2022 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 35473803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using response-time latencies to measure athletes' doping attitudes: the brief implicit attitude test identifies substance abuse in bodybuilders.
    Brand R; Wolff W; Thieme D
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2014 Sep; 9():36. PubMed ID: 25209168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: a methodology study.
    Petróczi A; Aidman EV; Nepusz T
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2008 Apr; 3():9. PubMed ID: 18426575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping: Which better predicts athletes' vigilance towards unintentional doping?
    Chan DKC; Keatley DA; Tang TCW; Dimmock JA; Hagger MS
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Mar; 21(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 28622975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incongruence in doping related attitudes, beliefs and opinions in the context of discordant behavioural data: in which measure do we trust?
    Petróczi A; Uvacsek M; Nepusz T; Deshmukh N; Shah I; Aidman EV; Barker J; Tóth M; Naughton DP
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18804. PubMed ID: 21541317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cerebral Correlates of Automatic Associations Towards Performance Enhancing Substances.
    Schindler S; Wolff W
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1923. PubMed ID: 26733914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intentional faking of the single category Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Association Test.
    Stieger S; Göritz AS; Hergovich A; Voracek M
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 22049663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Korean national athletes' knowledge, practices, and attitudes of doping: a cross-sectional study.
    Kim T; Kim YH
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2017 Feb; 12(1):7. PubMed ID: 28196542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sport motivation and doping in adolescent athletes.
    Mudrak J; Slepicka P; Slepickova I
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205222. PubMed ID: 30286200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doping knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Ugandan athletes': a cross-sectional study.
    Muwonge H; Zavuga R; Kabenge PA
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2015 Sep; 10():37. PubMed ID: 26395767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exaggeration is harder than understatement, but practice makes perfect!
    Röhner J; Schröder-Abé M; Schütz A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 21592941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtue or pretense? Looking behind self-declared innocence in doping.
    Petróczi A; Aidman EV; Hussain I; Deshmukh N; Nepusz T; Uvacsek M; Tóth M; Barker J; Naughton DP
    PLoS One; 2010 May; 5(5):e10457. PubMed ID: 20463978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing attitudes and intentions related to doping: An analysis of individual differences in need for cognition.
    Horcajo J; Santos D; Guyer JJ; Moreno L
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Dec; 37(24):2835-2843. PubMed ID: 31522612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-admitted behavior and perceived use of performance-enhancing vs psychoactive drugs among competitive athletes.
    Uvacsek M; Nepusz T; Naughton DP; Mazanov J; Ránky MZ; Petróczi A
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2011 Apr; 21(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 19903314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychological and social correlates of doping attitudes among Italian athletes.
    Zucchetti G; Candela F; Villosio C
    Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Feb; 26(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 25168080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cheater, cheater, pumpkin eater: the Dark Triad, attitudes towards doping, and cheating behaviour among athletes.
    Nicholls AR; Madigan DJ; Duncan L; Hallward L; Lazuras L; Bingham K; Fairs LRW
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2020 Sep; 20(8):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31726949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.