BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25902321)

  • 1. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
    Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output.
    Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiac Output Measurements Based on the Pulse Wave Transit Time and Thoracic Impedance Exhibit Limited Agreement With Thermodilution Method During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.
    Magliocca A; Rezoagli E; Anderson TA; Burns SM; Ichinose F; Chitilian HV
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 28598912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output.
    Bubenek-Turconi SI; Craciun M; Miclea I; Perel A
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 23757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical validation of pulse contour and pulse wave transit time-based continuous cardiac output analyses in Thai patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Wacharasint P; Kunakorn P; Pankongsap P; Preechanukul R
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Jan; 97 Suppl 1():S55-60. PubMed ID: 24855843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
    Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
    Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Fot EV; Zakharov VI; Izotova NN; Yudina AS; Dityateva ZA; Gromova YV; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
    Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radial Artery Applanation Tonometry for Continuous Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement: A Comparison With Intermittent Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution in Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery.
    Wagner JY; Sarwari H; Schön G; Kubik M; Kluge S; Reichenspurner H; Reuter DA; Saugel B
    Crit Care Med; 2015 Jul; 43(7):1423-8. PubMed ID: 25844700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of noninvasive estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) compared to thermodilution cardiac output: a pilot study in cardiac patients.
    Ball TR; Tricinella AP; Kimbrough BA; Luna S; Gloyna DF; Villamaria FJ; Culp WC
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1128-32. PubMed ID: 23992653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lack of agreement and trending ability of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor compared with thermodilution.
    Møller-Sørensen H; Hansen KL; Østergaard M; Andersen LW; Møller K
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Apr; 56(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 22191436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: a method comparison study in patients treated in the intensive care unit after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Greiwe G; Peters V; Hapfelmeier A; Romagnoli S; Kubik M; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):643-648. PubMed ID: 31456071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between continuous non-invasive estimated cardiac output by pulse wave transit time and thermodilution method.
    Sinha AC; Singh PM; Grewal N; Aman M; Dubowitz G
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2014; 17(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 25281622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of acute pulmonary hypertension on cardiac output measurements: calibrated pulse contour analysis, transpulmonary and pulmonary artery thermodilution against a modified Fick method in an animal model.
    Kutter APN; Mosing M; Hartnack S; Raszplewicz J; Renggli M; Mauch JY; Hofer CK
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Jul; 121(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 25742632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiac output and stroke volume variation measured by the pulse wave transit time method: a comparison with an arterial pressure-based cardiac output system.
    Suzuki T; Suzuki Y; Okuda J; Minoshima R; Misonoo Y; Ueda T; Kato J; Nagata H; Yamada T; Morisaki H
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Jun; 33(3):385-392. PubMed ID: 29948667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration.
    Manecke GR; Auger WR
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Feb; 21(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 17289472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous cardiac output monitoring with an uncalibrated pulse contour method in patients supported with mechanical pulsatile assist device.
    Scolletta S; Miraldi F; Romano SM; Muzzi L
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 13(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21454314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arterial pressure waveform analysis versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement during open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective observational study.
    Montenij LJ; Buhre WF; de Jong SA; Harms JH; van Herwaarden JA; Kruitwagen CL; de Waal EE
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25303970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
    Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.