These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25903617)

  • 1. Epochs: Disputed start dates for Anthropocene.
    Zalasiewicz J
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):436. PubMed ID: 25903617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining the anthropocene.
    Lewis SL; Maslin MA
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7542):171-80. PubMed ID: 25762280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anthropocene: The human age.
    Monastersky R
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7542):144-7. PubMed ID: 25762264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropocene: its stratigraphic basis.
    Zalasiewicz J; Waters C; Head MJ
    Nature; 2017 Jan; 541(7637):289. PubMed ID: 28102252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Humans versus Earth: the quest to define the Anthropocene.
    Subramanian M
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7768):168-170. PubMed ID: 31388169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new world of the Anthropocene.
    Zalasiewicz J; Williams M; Steffen W; Crutzen P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2228-31. PubMed ID: 20184359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Define the Anthropocene in terms of the whole Earth.
    Hamilton C
    Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7616):251. PubMed ID: 27535500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geologists reject the Anthropocene as Earth's new epoch - after 15 years of debate.
    Witze A
    Nature; 2024 Mar; 627(8003):249-250. PubMed ID: 38448535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anthropocene: social science misconstrued.
    Castree N
    Nature; 2017 Jan; 541(7637):289. PubMed ID: 28102246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anthropocene: event or epoch?
    Bauer AM; Edgeworth M; Edwards LE; Ellis EC; Gibbard P; Merritts DJ
    Nature; 2021 Sep; 597(7876):332. PubMed ID: 34522014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geologists seek to put an end to blind dates.
    Clarke T
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6958):550-1. PubMed ID: 14534555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are we in the Anthropocene yet?
    Nature; 2024 Mar; 627(8004):466. PubMed ID: 38509282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why it was right to reject the Anthropocene as a geological epoch.
    Maslin M; Edgeworth M; Ellis EC; Gibbard PL
    Nature; 2024 May; 629(8010):41. PubMed ID: 38689050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are we in the Anthropocene? Geologists could define new epoch for Earth.
    Prillaman M
    Nature; 2023 Jan; 613(7942):14-15. PubMed ID: 36517678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 'Anthropocene' is here to stay - and it's better not as a geological epoch.
    Roland TP; Swindles GT; Ruffell A
    Nature; 2024 Mar; 627(8005):735. PubMed ID: 38531989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. All in good time.
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7542):129-30. PubMed ID: 25762244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chronometers and units in early archaeology and paleontology.
    Lyman RL; O'Brien MJ
    Am Antiq; 2000; 65(4):691-707. PubMed ID: 17216897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Anthropocene concept in ecology and conservation.
    Corlett RT
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 Jan; 30(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 25468360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The human epoch.
    Nature; 2011 May; 473(7347):254. PubMed ID: 21593817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spheroidal carbonaceous fly ash particles provide a globally synchronous stratigraphic marker for the Anthropocene.
    Rose NL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(7):4155-62. PubMed ID: 25790111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.