BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25904706)

  • 1. Discriminating evidence accumulation from urgency signals in speeded decision making.
    Hawkins GE; Wagenmakers EJ; Ratcliff R; Brown SD
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 114(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 25904706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early evidence affects later decisions: why evidence accumulation is required to explain response time data.
    Winkel J; Keuken MC; van Maanen L; Wagenmakers EJ; Forstmann BU
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 24395093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting the evidence for collapsing boundaries and urgency signals in perceptual decision-making.
    Hawkins GE; Forstmann BU; Wagenmakers EJ; Ratcliff R; Brown SD
    J Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 35(6):2476-84. PubMed ID: 25673842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence and Urgency Related EEG Signals during Dynamic Decision-Making in Humans.
    Yau Y; Hinault T; Taylor M; Cisek P; Fellows LK; Dagher A
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(26):5711-5722. PubMed ID: 34035140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of urgency in decision making based on dynamic information.
    Ferrucci L; Genovesio A; Marcos E
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Oct; 17(10):e1009455. PubMed ID: 34606494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling evidence accumulation decision processes using integral equations: Urgency-gating and collapsing boundaries.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Mar; 129(2):235-267. PubMed ID: 34410765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Think fast! The implications of emphasizing urgency in decision-making.
    Evans NJ
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104704. PubMed ID: 33975126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normative decision rules in changing environments.
    Barendregt NW; Gold JI; Josić K; Kilpatrick ZP
    Elife; 2022 Oct; 11():. PubMed ID: 36282065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.
    Forstmann BU; Ratcliff R; Wagenmakers EJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():641-66. PubMed ID: 26393872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The urgency-gating model can explain the effects of early evidence.
    Carland MA; Thura D; Cisek P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1830-8. PubMed ID: 26452377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model.
    Cisek P; Puskas GA; El-Murr S
    J Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 29(37):11560-71. PubMed ID: 19759303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A parameter recovery assessment of time-variant models of decision-making.
    Evans NJ; Trueblood JS; Holmes WR
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):193-206. PubMed ID: 30924107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Striatal activation reflects urgency in perceptual decision making.
    van Maanen L; Fontanesi L; Hawkins GE; Forstmann BU
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():294-303. PubMed ID: 27355435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural activity in macaque parietal cortex reflects temporal integration of visual motion signals during perceptual decision making.
    Huk AC; Shadlen MN
    J Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 25(45):10420-36. PubMed ID: 16280581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The computations that support simple decision-making: A comparison between the diffusion and urgency-gating models.
    Evans NJ; Hawkins GE; Boehm U; Wagenmakers EJ; Brown SD
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16433. PubMed ID: 29180789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision making by urgency gating: theory and experimental support.
    Thura D; Beauregard-Racine J; Fradet CW; Cisek P
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Dec; 108(11):2912-30. PubMed ID: 22993260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Covert Response Activation to Test Latent Assumptions of Formal Decision-Making Models in Humans.
    Servant M; White C; Montagnini A; Burle B
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(28):10371-85. PubMed ID: 26180211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making.
    Evans NJ; Dutilh G; Wagenmakers EJ; van der Maas HLJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Sep; 121():101292. PubMed ID: 32217348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urgency, leakage, and the relative nature of information processing in decision-making.
    Trueblood JS; Heathcote A; Evans NJ; Holmes WR
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Jan; 128(1):160-186. PubMed ID: 32852976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are there jumps in evidence accumulation, and what, if anything, do they reflect psychologically? An analysis of Lévy Flights models of decision-making.
    Rasanan AHH; Rad JA; Sewell DK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 37528276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.