423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25905647)
1. Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 1, Principles and Techniques.
Tang A; Cloutier G; Szeverenyi NM; Sirlin CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 25905647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 2, Diagnostic Performance, Confounders, and Future Directions.
Tang A; Cloutier G; Szeverenyi NM; Sirlin CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 25905762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound or MR elastography of liver: which one shall I use?
Yin M; Venkatesh SK
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jul; 43(7):1546-1551. PubMed ID: 28988274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Liver fibrosis assessment: MR and US elastography.
Ozturk A; Olson MC; Samir AE; Venkatesh SK
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Sep; 47(9):3037-3050. PubMed ID: 34687329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis using ultrasound-based shear wave measurement and comparison to magnetic resonance elastography.
Zhao H; Chen J; Meixner DD; Xie H; Shamdasani V; Zhou S; Robert JL; Urban MW; Sanchez W; Callstrom MR; Ehman RL; Greenleaf JF; Chen S
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Sep; 33(9):1597-604. PubMed ID: 25154941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of liver viscoelasticity with acoustic radiation force: a study of hepatic fibrosis in a rat model.
Chen X; Shen Y; Zheng Y; Lin H; Guo Y; Zhu Y; Zhang X; Wang T; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):2091-102. PubMed ID: 23993170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR elastography: Principles, guidelines, and terminology.
Manduca A; Bayly PJ; Ehman RL; Kolipaka A; Royston TJ; Sack I; Sinkus R; Van Beers BE
Magn Reson Med; 2021 May; 85(5):2377-2390. PubMed ID: 33296103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hepatic fibrosis: prospective comparison of MR elastography and US shear-wave elastography for evaluation.
Yoon JH; Lee JM; Joo I; Lee ES; Sohn JY; Jang SK; Lee KB; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):772-82. PubMed ID: 25007047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical utility of 3D magnetic resonance elastography in patients with biliary obstruction.
Ma Y; Wang G; Gao F; Ma B; Song Q; Zhong S; Liu Y; Hong Y
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 34791513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.
Lefebvre T; Wartelle-Bladou C; Wong P; Sebastiani G; Giard JM; Castel H; Murphy-Lavallée J; Olivié D; Ilinca A; Sylvestre MP; Gilbert G; Gao ZH; Nguyen BN; Cloutier G; Tang A
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6477-6488. PubMed ID: 31278577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liver fibrosis: Review of current imaging and MRI quantification techniques.
Petitclerc L; Sebastiani G; Gilbert G; Cloutier G; Tang A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1276-1295. PubMed ID: 27981751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-validation of MR elastography and ultrasound transient elastography in liver stiffness measurement: discrepancy in the results of cirrhotic liver.
Motosugi U; Ichikawa T; Amemiya F; Sou H; Sano K; Muhi A; Enomoto N; Araki T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Mar; 35(3):607-10. PubMed ID: 22002910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating liver stiffness and viscosity for fibrosis, steatosis and activity staging using shear wave elastography.
Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Bousquet L; Corouge M; Cosconea S; Amroun D; Tripon S; Terris B; Mallet V; Sogni P; Tanter M; Pol S
J Hepatol; 2015 Feb; 62(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 25251998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity by using shear waves induced by ultrasound radiation force.
Chen S; Sanchez W; Callstrom MR; Gorman B; Lewis JT; Sanderson SO; Greenleaf JF; Xie H; Shi Y; Pashley M; Shamdasani V; Lachman M; Metz S
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):964-70. PubMed ID: 23220900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance elastography vs. point shear wave ultrasound elastography for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction.
Kennedy P; Bane O; Hectors SJ; Gordic S; Berger M; Delaney V; Salem F; Lewis S; Menon M; Taouli B
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108949. PubMed ID: 32179424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance elastography: basic principles, technique, and clinical applications in the liver.
Akkaya HE; Erden A; Kuru Öz D; Ünal S; Erden İ
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018 Nov; 24(6):328-335. PubMed ID: 30272563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver.
Venkatesh SK; Ehman RL
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2014 Aug; 22(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 25086938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging of hepatic fibrosis: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and shear wave elastography in the same individuals.
Yoon JH; Lee JM; Woo HS; Yu MH; Joo I; Lee ES; Sohn JY; Lee KB; Han JK; Choi BI
Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 23483022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in chronic viral hepatitis C: agreement among 1D transient elastography, 2D shear wave elastography, and magnetic resonance elastography.
Matos J; Paparo F; Bacigalupo L; Cenderello G; Mussetto I; De Cesari M; Bernardi SP; Cevasco L; Forni GL; Cassola G; Rollandi GA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Dec; 44(12):4011-4021. PubMed ID: 31696266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography.
Asbach P; Klatt D; Hamhaber U; Braun J; Somasundaram R; Hamm B; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2008 Aug; 60(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 18666132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
