579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25906173)
1. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.
Munjal T; Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S121-8. PubMed ID: 26561883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.
Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 23172009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reverberation negatively impacts musical sound quality for cochlear implant users.
Roy AT; Vigeant M; Munjal T; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S105-13. PubMed ID: 26561881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.
Roy AT; Penninger RT; Pearl MS; Wuerfel W; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Buechner A; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 26669557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Compression on Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users.
Gilbert M; Jiradejvong P; Limb C
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1368-1375. PubMed ID: 30946137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users.
Müller J; Brill S; Hagen R; Moeltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):185-98. PubMed ID: 22814383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
Magnusson L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.
Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2014; 76(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24685836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Honeder C; Ehrenreich I; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e272-81. PubMed ID: 25127325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of various electrode configurations on music perception, intonation and speaker gender identification.
Landwehr M; Fürstenberg D; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 23684531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].
Gu P; Xi X; Han D; Hong M; Wang Q; Yang S; Dai P
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 23937013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Galindo J; Lassaletta L; Mora RP; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Gavilán J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1223-9. PubMed ID: 22766835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Melody and chord discrimination of cochlear implant users in different pitch ranges.
Boeckmann-Barthel M; Ziese M; Rostalski D; Arens C; Verhey JL
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14(5):246-51. PubMed ID: 23510720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sound quality perception of cochlear implant recipients: low-frequency information and foreign-language effect.
Arslan NÖ; Akbulut AA; Köse B; Karaman-Demirel A; Derinsu U
Int J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 61(12):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 34894993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
