519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25906183)
1. Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images?
Hodgdon T; McInnes MD; Schieda N; Flood TA; Lamb L; Thornhill RE
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):787-96. PubMed ID: 25906183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiomics of small renal masses on multiphasic CT: accuracy of machine learning-based classification models for the differentiation of renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma without visible fat.
Yang R; Wu J; Sun L; Lai S; Xu Y; Liu X; Ma Y; Zhen X
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 31468159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma.
Feng Z; Rong P; Cao P; Zhou Q; Zhu W; Yan Z; Liu Q; Wang W
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1625-1633. PubMed ID: 29134348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of quantitative CT texture analysis in differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from clear cell renal cell carcinoma on four-phase contrast-enhanced CT images.
You MW; Kim N; Choi HJ
Clin Radiol; 2019 Jul; 74(7):547-554. PubMed ID: 31010583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Textural differences between renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography texture analysis with independent external validation.
Kocak B; Yardimci AH; Bektas CT; Turkcanoglu MH; Erdim C; Yucetas U; Koca SB; Kilickesmez O
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():149-157. PubMed ID: 30292260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT.
Leng S; Takahashi N; Gomez Cardona D; Kitajima K; McCollough B; Li Z; Kawashima A; Leibovich BC; McCollough CH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 28025654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Leng S; Kitajima K; Gomez-Cardona D; Thapa P; Carter RE; Leibovich BC; Sasiwimonphan K; Sasaguri K; Kawashima A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1194-202. PubMed ID: 26587925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unenhanced CT and MRI Parameters That Can Be Used to Reliably Predict Fat-Invisible Angiomyolipoma.
Jeong CJ; Park BK; Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26797361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circularity Index on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Helps Distinguish Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analyses of Histologically Proven 257 Small Renal Tumors Less Than 4 cm.
Kang HS; Park JJ
Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 33660463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma With CT: Evaluation by Qualitative Imaging Features and Texture Analysis.
Schieda N; Thornhill RE; Al-Subhi M; McInnes MD; Shabana WM; van der Pol CB; Flood TA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1013-23. PubMed ID: 25905936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Accuracy of Unenhanced CT Analysis to Differentiate Low-Grade From High-Grade Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Schieda N; Lim RS; Krishna S; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Thornhill RE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1079-1087. PubMed ID: 29547054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Analysis of Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced CT Images: A Pilot Study of Preoperative Prediction of Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Tang Z; Yu D; Ni T; Zhao T; Jin Y; Dong E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):370-382. PubMed ID: 31799870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and external validation of the multichannel deep learning model based on unenhanced CT for differentiating fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: a two-center retrospective study.
Yao H; Tian L; Liu X; Li S; Chen Y; Cao J; Zhang Z; Chen Z; Feng Z; Xu Q; Zhu J; Wang Y; Guo Y; Chen W; Li C; Li P; Wang H; Luo J
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Nov; 149(17):15827-15838. PubMed ID: 37672075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma.
Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT negative attenuation pixel distribution and texture analysis for detection of fat in small angiomyolipoma on unenhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Takeuchi M; Sasaguri K; Leng S; Froemming A; Kawashima A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jun; 41(6):1142-51. PubMed ID: 27015866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
