808 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25906198)
1. Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovine-derived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study.
Lutz R; Berger-Fink S; Stockmann P; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 25906198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs.
Jensen T; Schou S; Svendsen PA; Forman JL; Gundersen HJ; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):902-10. PubMed ID: 22044477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans.
Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants.
Hatano N; Shimizu Y; Ooya K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 15142097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical and radiographic outcomes of delayed implant placements after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with different grafting materials].
Zhang X; Sun F; Zhang F; Zhang ZY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 47(10):584-7. PubMed ID: 23302379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute.
Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs.
Jensen T; Schou S; Gundersen HJ; Forman JL; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):635-44. PubMed ID: 22530746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement.
Tawil G; Mawla M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery with BioOss® mixed with a bone marrow concentrate or autogenous bone: test of principle on implant survival and clinical performance.
Rickert D; Vissink A; Slot WJ; Sauerbier S; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 43(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 24183511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review.
Jensen T; Schou S; Stavropoulos A; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 21443592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla after sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone: a 9-year clinical study.
Oliveira R; El Hage M; Carrel JP; Lombardi T; Bernard JP
Implant Dent; 2012 Oct; 21(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 22968571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gene expression and morphometric parameters of human bone biopsies after maxillary sinus floor elevation with autologous bone combined with Bio-Oss® or BoneCeramic®.
Caubet J; Ramis JM; Ramos-Murguialday M; Morey MÁ; Monjo M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):727-35. PubMed ID: 24684367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.
Felice P; Marchetti C; Piattelli A; Pellegrino G; Checchi V; Worthington H; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 1(3):183-98. PubMed ID: 20467621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant stability after sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles of different sizes: a prospective, randomized and controlled split-mouth clinical trial.
Dos Anjos TL; de Molon RS; Paim PR; Marcantonio E; Marcantonio E; Faeda RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 45(12):1556-1563. PubMed ID: 27692642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss as a sole graft: a histologic, radiographic and preliminary clinical study].
Liu Y; Chen F; Feng Y; Xie C; Song YL; Li DH
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 48(9):513-7. PubMed ID: 24314275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation.
John HD; Wenz B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 15101590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation.
Hising P; Bolin A; Branting C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 11280367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
